ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2011
Perioperative mechanical circulatory support in children with critical heart disease.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- B-type natriuretic peptide levels predict outcomes in infants undergoing cardiac surgery in a lesion-dependent fashion.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementThe treatment of cardiovascular failure in the perioperative period with the use of mechanical circulatory support is a well-recognized, well-developed, and commonly utilized treatment modality. Regardless of the exact circumstances of initiation, the use of a support device is a "bridge." Where there has been an acute myocardial insult, short-term assist devices can serve as a "bridge to immediate survival," a "bridge to recovery," or even a "bridge to the next decision." Mechanical circulatory support can serve as a treatment of cardiovascular decompensation caused by myocarditis, acute myocardial insult, low cardiac output following surgery, and congenital heart disease. The utilization of such support carries significant risks such as bleeding, infection, and thrombosis. However, these can be minimized in order to allow for the safe and effective deployment of this therapeutic strategy. One specific therapeutic domain in which these devices provide immediate impact is during cardiac arrest. Although outcomes of cardiac arrest remain poor, use of a mechanical device as an intervention has allowed salvage of otherwise certain mortality. However, it is important to note that the utility of support was most pronounced in patients that were not on either extreme of the survival prediction curve. This can be best summarized by the concept of "not too early, not too late." Therefore, it is the responsibility of the entire care team to find the appropriate patient population in which to "pull the trigger" on mechanical support as a therapy. This decision point is supported by a monitoring strategy that can be utilized to predict deterioration and intervene adequately. Most importantly, an effective monitoring strategy allows the practitioner to judge the effectiveness of treatment and support strategies and make adjustments in a timely manner, potentially with mechanical support in the perioperative period.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.