Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21747931›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

The Drosophila gap gene network is composed of two parallel toggle switches.

Dmitri Papatsenko, Michael Levine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Latent space of a small genetic network: Geometry of dynamics and information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Monostability and bistability of biological switches.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. NetExplore: a web server for modeling small network motifs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Dynamic interpretation of maternal inputs by the Drosophila segmentation gene network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dmitri PapatsenkoDepartment of Gene and Cell Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Black Family Stem Cell Institute, New York, New York, United States of America. dimitri.papatsenko@mssm.edu
Michael Levine
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DORSAL MORPHOGENR37GM046638 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LEVINE, MICHAEL STEVEN · 2003 to 2012
$3.8M
MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DORSAL MORPHOGENR01GM046638 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI LEVINE, MICHAEL STEVEN · 1991 to 2016
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM46638NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046638NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM046638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila "gap" genes provide the first response to maternal gradients in the early fly embryo. Gap genes are expressed in a series of broad bands across the embryo during first hours of development. The gene network controlling the gap gene expression patterns includes inputs from maternal gradients and mutual repression between the gap genes themselves. In this study we propose a modular design for the gap gene network, involving two relatively independent network domains. The core of each network domain includes a toggle switch corresponding to a pair of mutually repressive gap genes, operated in space by maternal inputs. The toggle switches present in the gap network are evocative of the phage lambda switch, but they are operated positionally (in space) by the maternal gradients, so the synthesis rates for the competing components change along the embryo anterior-posterior axis. Dynamic model, constructed based on the proposed principle, with elements of fractional site occupancy, required 5-7 parameters to fit quantitative spatial expression data for gap gradients. The identified model solutions (parameter combinations) reproduced major dynamic features of the gap gradient system and explained gap expression in a variety of segmentation mutants.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, GeneticAnimalsBacteriophage lambdaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianEnvironmentGene SilencingGenes, InsectMutationDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21747931
PMCPMC3128594
OpenAlexW2062098146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.