Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21747773›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2011

Why would Musical Training Benefit the Neural Encoding of Speech? The OPERA Hypothesis.

Aniruddh D Patel

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 234 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
234citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03867032 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Auditory Training With Speech Related Acoustic Cues Using Psychophysical Testing

TypeinterventionalSponsorEast Carolina UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsDeafnessArmsAuditory training
NCT06734897 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Music Therapy on Speech Intelligibility in Noise With Cochlear Implants

TypeinterventionalSponsorArmina KreuzerRan2025 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsMusic Therapy After Cochlear ImplantationArmsmusic therapy after Cochlear Implantation, no music therapy after Cochlear Implantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

234 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. How musical rhythm training improves short-term memory for faces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Musical intervention enhances infants' neural processing of temporal structure in music and speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Trial
  12. Beat synchronization predicts neural speech encoding and reading readiness in preschoolers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Trial
  13. Music enrichment programs improve the neural encoding of speech in at-risk children.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

174 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aniruddh D PatelDepartment of Theoretical Neurobiology, The Neurosciences Institute San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that musical training benefits the neural encoding of speech. This paper offers a hypothesis specifying why such benefits occur. The "OPERA" hypothesis proposes that such benefits are driven by adaptive plasticity in speech-processing networks, and that this plasticity occurs when five conditions are met. These are: (1) Overlap: there is anatomical overlap in the brain networks that process an acoustic feature used in both music and speech (e.g., waveform periodicity, amplitude envelope), (2) Precision: music places higher demands on these shared networks than does speech, in terms of the precision of processing, (3) Emotion: the musical activities that engage this network elicit strong positive emotion, (4) Repetition: the musical activities that engage this network are frequently repeated, and (5) Attention: the musical activities that engage this network are associated with focused attention. According to the OPERA hypothesis, when these conditions are met neural plasticity drives the networks in question to function with higher precision than needed for ordinary speech communication. Yet since speech shares these networks with music, speech processing benefits. The OPERA hypothesis is used to account for the observed superior subcortical encoding of speech in musically trained individuals, and to suggest mechanisms by which musical training might improve linguistic reading abilities.

Indexed as

hypothesismusicneural encodingneural plasticityspeech

Identifiers

PMID21747773
PMCPMC3128244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.