Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21747646›Full record

ReviewInfectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology2011

Chlamydia trachomatis vaccine research through the years.

Katelijn Schautteet, Evelien De Clercq, Daisy Vanrompay

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Intranasal delivery ofHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  3. Therapeutic Options forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. ACS infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. In silico vaccine design againstNetwork modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Membrane vesicle production by Chlamydia trachomatis as an adaptive response.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katelijn SchautteetDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. katelijn.schautteet@ugent.be
Evelien De Clercq
Daisy Vanrompay
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is a Gram-negative obligate intracellular bacterium. It is the leading cause of bacterial sexual transmitted infections (STIs). World Health Organization figures estimated that over 90 million new cases of genital C. trachomatis infections occur worldwide each year. A vaccination program is considered to be the best approach to reduce the prevalence of C. trachomatis infections, as it would be much cheaper and have a greater impact on controlling C. trachomatis infections worldwide rather than a screening program or treating infections with antibiotics. Currently, there are no vaccines available which effectively protect against a C. trachomatis genital infection despite the many efforts that have been made throughout the years. In this paper, the many attempts to develop a protective vaccine against a genital C. trachomatis infection will be reviewed.

Indexed as

Rickettsial VaccinesAnimalsBiomedical ResearchChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMiceVaccines, SyntheticRickettsial VaccinesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID21747646
PMCPMC3124257
OpenAlexW1966909537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.