ArticleThe Journal of physiology2011
Intracellular recordings of subnucleus reticularis dorsalis neurones revealed novel electrophysiological properties and windup mechanisms.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of trigeminal neurostimulation on heart rate variability: comparing cutaneous (Tragus) and tongue (Antero-Dorsal mucosa) stimulation.BMC oral health · 2024Trial
- Neonatal Mice Spinal Cord Interneurons Send Axons through the Dorsal Roots.Experimental neurobiology · 2022Article
- Reticular Formation and Pain: The Past and the Future.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2017Review
- Cat's medullary reticulospinal and subnucleus reticularis dorsalis noxious neurons form a coupled neural circuit through collaterals of descending axons.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Electrophysiological study of supraspinal input and spinal output of cat's subnucleus reticularis dorsalis (SRD) neurons.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aδ- and/or C-fibre nociceptive inputs drive subnucleus reticularis dorsalis (SRD) neurones projecting to a variety of regions including the spinal cord and the nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (NRGc), but their electrophysiological properties are largely unknown. Here we intracellularly recorded the SRD neuronal responses to injection of polarising current pulses as well as to electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal posterior quadrant (PQ) and the NRGc. Three different classes of neurones with distinct electrophysiological properties were found: type I were characterised by the absence of a fast postspike hyperpolarisation, type II by the presence of a postspike hyperpolarisation followed by a depolarisation resembling low threshold calcium spikes (LTSs), and type III (lacking LTSs) had a fast postspike hyperpolarisation deinactivating A-like potassium channels leading to enlarged interspike intervals. All three classes generated depolarising sags to hyperpolarising current pulses and showed 3-4.5 Hz subthreshold oscillatory activity leading to windup when intracellularly injecting low-frequency repetitive depolarising pulses as well as in response to 0.5-2 Hz NRGc and PQ electrical stimulation. About half of the 132 sampled neurones responded antidromically to NRGc stimulation with more than 65% of the NRGc-antidromic cells, pertaining to all three types, also responding antidromically to PQ stimulation. NRGc stimulation induced exclusively excitatory first-synaptic-responses whilst PQ stimulation induced first-response excitation in most cases, but inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in a few type II and type III neurones not projecting to the spinal cord that also displayed cumulative inhibitory effects (inverse windup). The results show that SRD cells (i) can actively regulate different temporal firing patterns due to their intrinsic electrophysiological properties, (ii) generate windup upon gradual membrane depolarisation produced by low-frequency intracellular current injection and by C-fibre tonic input, both processes leading subthreshold oscillations to threshold, and (iii) collateralise to the NRGc and the spinal cord, potentially providing simultaneous regulation of ascending noxious information and motor reactions to pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.