Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21745601›Full record

ReviewRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2011

Similarities and differences in mechanisms of phrenic and hypoglossal motor facilitation.

Tracy L Baker-Herman, Kristi A Strey

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Low level CORespiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cervical spinal 5-HTJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. JCI insight · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tracy L Baker-HermanDepartment of Comparative Biosciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. bakert@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu
Kristi A Strey
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Mechanisms of inactivity-induced respiratory plasticityR01HL105511 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BAKER, TRACY L · 2011 to 2020
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL105511NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intermittent hypoxia-induced long-term facilitation (LTF) is variably expressed in the motor output of several inspiratory nerves, such as the phrenic and hypoglossal. Compared to phrenic LTF (pLTF), less is known about hypoglossal LTF (hLTF), although it is often assumed that cellular mechanisms are the same. While fundamental mechanisms appear to be similar, potentially important differences exist in the modulation of pLTF and hLTF. The primary objectives of this paper are to: (1) review similarities and differences in pLTF and hLTF, pointing out knowledge gaps and (2) present new data suggesting that reduced respiratory neural activity elicits differential plasticity in phrenic and hypoglossal output (inactivity-induced phrenic and hypoglossal motor facilitation, iPMF and iHMF), suggesting that these motor pool-specific differences are not unique to LTF. Differences in fundamental mechanisms or modulation of plasticity among motor pools may confer the capacity to mount a complex ventilatory response to specific challenges, particularly in motor pools with different "jobs" in the control of breathing.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansHypoglossal NerveMotor NeuronsPhrenic NerveRespiratory Mechanics

Identifiers

PMID21745601
PMCPMC3183164
OpenAlexW2081791543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.