ArticleProgress in biophysics and molecular biology2011
Minimum Information about a Cardiac Electrophysiology Experiment (MICEE): standardised reporting for model reproducibility, interoperability, and data sharing.
Article in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Variability in reported midpoints of (in)activation of cardiac INa.The Journal of general physiology · 2025Pooled it
- Models of the human heart for biomedical research: Opportunities and challenges.Physiological reports · 2026Review
- Disturbed Repolarization-Relaxation Coupling During Acute Myocardial Ischemia Permits Systolic Mechano-Arrhythmogenesis.Circulation research · 2025Article
- The challenges of research data management in cardiovascular science: a DGK and DZHK position paper-executive summary.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Review
- Models of the cardiac L-type calcium current: A quantitative review.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2023Review
- Tipping the scales of understanding: An engineering approach to design and implement whole-body cardiac electrophysiology experimental models.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Portable low-cost macroscopic mapping system for all-optical cardiac electrophysiology.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- TheFrontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Guidelines for assessment of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias in small animals.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022Review
- Reevaluating methods reporting practices to improve reproducibility: an analysis of methodological rigor for the Langendorff whole heart technique.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022Review
- Demographic and Methodological Heterogeneity in Electrocardiogram Signals From Guinea Pigs.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Drivers of Sinoatrial Node Automaticity in Zebrafish: Comparison With Mechanisms of Mammalian Pacemaker Function.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Calibration of ionic and cellular cardiac electrophysiology models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020Review
- Sinoatrial Node Structure, Mechanics, Electrophysiology and the Chronotropic Response to Stretch in Rabbit and Mouse.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Data integration in cardiac electrophysiology ablation toward achieving proper interoperability in health information systems.Journal of education and health promotion · 2020Article
- Ischemia Enhances the Acute Stretch-Induced Increase in Calcium Spark Rate in Ventricular Myocytes.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Scientist and data architect collaborate to curate and archive an inner ear electrophysiology data collection.PloS one · 2019Article
- Data Management in Computational Systems Biology: Exploring Standards, Tools, Databases, and Packaging Best Practices.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Reproducible model development in the cardiac electrophysiology Web Lab.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2018Article
- Predicting changes to IScientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
60 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac experimental electrophysiology is in need of a well-defined Minimum Information Standard for recording, annotating, and reporting experimental data. As a step towards establishing this, we present a draft standard, called Minimum Information about a Cardiac Electrophysiology Experiment (MICEE). The ultimate goal is to develop a useful tool for cardiac electrophysiologists which facilitates and improves dissemination of the minimum information necessary for reproduction of cardiac electrophysiology research, allowing for easier comparison and utilisation of findings by others. It is hoped that this will enhance the integration of individual results into experimental, computational, and conceptual models. In its present form, this draft is intended for assessment and development by the research community. We invite the reader to join this effort, and, if deemed productive, implement the Minimum Information about a Cardiac Electrophysiology Experiment standard in their own work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.