Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21745159›Full record

ArticleCytotherapy2011

Comparison of two CD40-ligand/interleukin-2 vaccines in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Fatma Visal Okur, Eric Yvon, Ettore Biagi, Gianpietro Dotti, George Carrum, Helen Heslop, Martha P Mims, Joseph C Fratantoni, Madhusudan V Peshwa, Linhong Li and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. mRNA cancer vaccines: Advances, trends and challenges.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Multifunctional CD40L: pro- and anti-neoplastic activity.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Therapeutic cancer vaccines.Advances in cancer research · 2014
    Review
  8. Therapeutic cancer vaccines: current status and moving forward.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fatma Visal OkurCenter for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, The Methodist Hospital and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA. fatvis03@yahoo.com
Eric Yvon
Ettore Biagi
Gianpietro Dotti
George Carrum
Helen Heslop
Martha P Mims
Joseph C Fratantoni
Madhusudan V Peshwa
Linhong Li
Malcolm K Brenner
Baylor College of Medicine · USMaxCyte (United States) · USMethodist Hospital · USHouston Methodist · US

Funding

Tissue ResourceP50CA126752 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Leonid S Metelitsa · 2007 to 2026
$51.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA 126752NCI NIH HHS P50 CA126752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND

aimsSeveral studies have demonstrated that the immunogenicity of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells can be increased by manipulation of the CD40/CD40-ligand (CD40L) pathway. Although immunologic, and perhaps clinical, benefits have been obtained with an autologous CLL tumor vaccine obtained by transgenic expression of CD40L and interleukin (IL)-2, there is little information about the optimal gene transfer strategies.

methodsWe compared two different CLL vaccines prepared by adenoviral gene transfer and plasmid electroporation, analyzing their phenotype and immunostimulatory activity.

resultsWe found that higher expression of transgenic CD40L was mediated by adenoviral gene transfer than by plasmid transduction, and that adenoviral transfer of CD40L was associated with up-regulation of the co-stimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 and adhesion molecule CD54. In contrast, transgenic IL-2 secretion was greater following plasmid transduction. These phenotypic differences in the vaccines were associated with different functionality, both ex vivo and following administration to patients. Thus adenoviral vaccines induced greater activation of leukemia-reactive T cells ex vivo than plasmid vaccines. In treated patients, specific T-cell (T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2)) and humoral anti-leukemia responses were detected following administration of the adenoviral vaccine (n = 15), while recipients of the plasmid vaccine (n = 9) manifested only a low-level Th2 response. Progression-free survival at 2 years was 46.7% in the adenoviral vaccine recipients, versus 11.1 % in those receiving plasmid vaccine.

conclusionsCLL vaccines expressing the same transgenes but produced by distinct methods of gene transfer may differ in the polarity of the immune response they induce in patients.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesGene Transfer TechniquesAdenoviridaeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, CDAntigens, NeoplasmCD40 LigandCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationFemaleHumansInterleukin-2Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellLymphocyte ActivationAntigens, CDAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCD40 LigandInterleukin-2

Identifiers

PMID21745159
PMCPMC3687103
OpenAlexW2037701306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.