ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2012
Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2010 update. What is new?
Review in International urology and nephrology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peritoneal dialysis peritonitis due toRenal failure · 2025Review
- Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2016 update. What is new?International urology and nephrology · 2017Review
- Predicting one-year mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients: an analysis of the China Peritoneal Dialysis Registry.International journal of medical sciences · 2015Article
- RelapsingJMM case reports · 2014Article
- First case of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis caused by Cryptococcus arboriformis.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2014Article
- A single institutional experience of conversion of non-tunneled to tunneled hemodialysis catheters: a comparison to de novo placement.International urology and nephrology · 2013Article
- Prophylactic antibiotics for endoscopy-associated peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients.PloS one · 2013Article
- The peritoneal equilibration test should be included in routine monitoring of peritoneal dialysis patients.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal DialysisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) 2010 guidelines on PD-related infections reflect the bulk of knowledge acquired over the last 5 years. It includes new information about causative agents of peritonitis, isolation techniques, or therapeutic regimens. Monitoring of infection rates by reporting of peritonitis and exit site infections, isolated microorganism, and presumed etiology is recommended. Furthermore, special focus is given on careful evaluation of each episode of peritonitis in order to determine the route of infection and to reassess patient's training. In this article, we record the changes in the last ISPD (2010) guidelines compared to the previous ones published in March 2005.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21744125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.