ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2012
The impact of dialysis solution biocompatibility on ultrafiltration and on free water transport in rats.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- MiR-200a ameliorates peritoneal fibrosis and functional deterioration in a rat model of peritoneal dialysis.International urology and nephrology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compares different peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDF) in rats over a short contact time. For greater accuracy, net ultrafiltration (UF) and peritoneal transport indices, mass transfer area coefficient (MTAC) were scaled for the in vivo peritoneal surface area recruited (ivPSA) measured by microcomputerized tomography. Wistar rats underwent nephrectomy (5/6ths), were randomized into two groups and given 1.5% glucose PDF, either conventional acidic lactate (n = 14) or pH neutral bicarbonate (BicaVera) (n = 13); MTAC and UF were measured using a 90-min peritoneal equilibrium test (PET), fill volume (IPV) of 10 ml/100 g; small pore fluid transport was determined from sodium balance and used to calculate free water transport (FWT). Each ivPSA value was significantly correlated with the actual IPV, which varied from one rat to another. At 90 min of contact, there was no difference in recruited ivPSA in relation to PDFs. There was a difference (p < 0.01) in net UF/ivPSA 0.45 vs. 1.41 cm(2)/ml for bicarbonate versus lactate, as there was in the proportion of FWT with bicarbonate (42 ± 5% of net UF) compared to lactate (29 ± 4% of net UF). Net UF for individual values of ivPSA differs between conventional PDF and more biocompatible solutions, such as bicarbonate PDF. This observed change in UF cannot be fully explained by differences in glucose transport. The changes in FWT may be explained by the impact of the PDF biocompatibility on aquaporin function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.