Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21743062›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011

CSO validator: improving manual curation workflow for biological pathways.

Euna Jeong, Masao Nagasaki, Emi Ikeda, Yayoi Sekiya, Ayumu Saito, Satoru Miyano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Euna JeongHuman Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan.
Masao Nagasaki
Emi Ikeda
Yayoi Sekiya
Ayumu Saito
Satoru Miyano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryManual curation and validation of large-scale biological pathways are required to obtain high-quality pathway databases. In a typical curation process, model validation and model update based on appropriate feedback are repeated and requires considerable cooperation of scientists. We have developed a CSO (Cell System Ontology) validator to reduce the repetition and time during the curation process. This tool assists in quickly obtaining agreement among curators and domain experts and in providing a consistent and accurate pathway database. AVAILABILITY: The tool is available on http://csovalidator.csml.org. CONTACT: masao@hgc.jp.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSoftwareVocabulary, ControlledDatabases, FactualWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID21743062
PMCPMC3157922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.