Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21741760›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology2011

Basic research in kidney cancer.

Egbert Oosterwijk, W Kimryn Rathmell, Kerstin Junker, A Rose Brannon, Frédéric Pouliot, David S Finley, Peter F A Mulders, Ziya Kirkali, Hirotsugo Uemura, Arie Belldegrun

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DNA Methylation Signature Reveals Cell Ontogeny of Renal Cell Carcinomas.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. IL-33 is associated with unfavorable postoperative survival of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Egbert OosterwijkDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. e.oosterwijk@uro.umcn.nl
W Kimryn Rathmell
Kerstin Junker
A Rose Brannon
Frédéric Pouliot
David S Finley
Peter F A Mulders
Ziya Kirkali
Hirotsugo Uemura
Arie Belldegrun
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDokuz Eylül University · TRFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEKindai University · JPRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

CANCER CELL BIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA071341 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHANNING J. DER, Yuliya Pylayeva-Gupta · 1996 to 2026
$5.0M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA071341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAdvances in basic research will enhance prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment of renal cancer patients.

objectiveTo discuss advances in our understanding of the molecular basis of renal cancer, targeted therapies, renal cancer and immunity, and genetic factors and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Data on recently published (2005-2011) basic science papers were reviewed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Advances in basic research have shown that renal cancers can be subdivided based on specific genetic profiles. Now that this molecular basis has been established, it is becoming clear that additional events play a major role in the development of renal cancer. For example, aberrant chromatin remodelling appears to be a main driving force behind tumour progression in clear cell RCC. A large number of potential biomarkers have emerged using various high-throughput platforms, but adequate biomarkers for RCC are still lacking. To bring the potential biomarkers and biomarker profiles to the clinical arena is a major challenge for the field. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for therapy has shifted the interest away from immunologic approaches. Nevertheless, a wealth of evidence supports immunotherapy for RCC. Interestingly, studies are now appearing that suggest a combination of TKI and immunotherapy may be beneficial. Thus far, little attention has been paid to patient-specific differences. With high-throughput methods becoming cheaper and with the advances in sequencing possibilities, this situation is expected to change rapidly.

conclusionsGreat strides have been made in the understanding of molecular mechanisms of RCC. This has led this field to the enviable position of having a range of molecularly targeted therapies. Large sequencing efforts are now revealing more and more genes responsible for tumour development and progression, offering new targets for therapy. It is foreseen that through integration of high-throughput platforms, personalised cancer treatment for RCC patients will become possible.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBase SequenceCarcinoma, Renal CellCombined Modality TherapyGene Expression ProfilingHumansKidney NeoplasmsMolecular Sequence DataMolecular Targeted TherapyProtein-Tyrosine KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsProtein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID21741760
PMCPMC4877128
OpenAlexW2072300037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.