Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21741328›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2011

Probing for DNA damage with β-hairpins: similarities in incision efficiencies of bulky DNA adducts by prokaryotic and human nucleotide excision repair systems in vitro.

Yang Liu, Dara Reeves, Konstantin Kropachev, Yuqin Cai, Shuang Ding, Marina Kolbanovskiy, Alexander Kolbanovskiy, Judith L Bolton, Suse Broyde, Bennett Van Houten and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in Research onMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Repair-Resistant DNA Lesions.Chemical research in toxicology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yang LiuChemistry Department, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Dara Reeves
Konstantin Kropachev
Yuqin Cai
Shuang Ding
Marina Kolbanovskiy
Alexander Kolbanovskiy
Judith L Bolton
Suse Broyde
Bennett Van Houten
Nicholas E Geacintov
New York University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Carcinogen-DNA Adducts: Topology, Conformation and Repair (Renewal)R01CA028038 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BROYDE, SUSE · 1985 to 2014
$4.7M
DNA Lesion Structures: Mutagenicity and RepairR01CA075449 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BROYDE, SUSE · 1997 to 2015
$4.3M
DNA damage recognition by nucleotide excision repair proteinsR01ES019566 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VAN HOUTEN, BENNETT · 2011 to 2020
$3.9M
Impact of PAH-DNA Lesions on DNA Repair and ReplicationR01CA099194 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI GEACINTOV, NICHOLAS E · 2003 to 2012
$3.3M
Isomeric HRT estrogen-DNA adducts: Structure and RepairR01CA112412 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI GEACINTOV, NICHOLAS E · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
SHARED INSTR FACILITIY FOR THE LIFE SCIC06RR016572 · NCRR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI LENNIE, PETER · 2001 to 2001
$665k
NCI NIH HHS CA099194NCI NIH HHS CA112412NCI NIH HHS CA28038NCI NIH HHS CA75449NCI NIH HHS R01 CA028038NCI NIH HHS R01 CA075449NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099194NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112412NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR016572NCRR NIH HHS C06RR-16572)NIEHS NIH HHS ES019566NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES019566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is an important prokaryotic and eukaryotic defense mechanism that removes a large variety of structurally distinct lesions in cellular DNA. While the proteins involved are completely different, the mode of action of these two repair systems is similar, involving a cut-and-patch mechanism in which an oligonucleotide sequence containing the lesion is excised. The prokaryotic and eukaryotic NER damage-recognition factors have common structural features of β-hairpin intrusion between the two DNA strands at the site of the lesion. In the present study, we explored the hypothesis that this common β-hairpin intrusion motif is mirrored in parallel NER incision efficiencies in the two systems. We have utilized human HeLa cell extracts and the prokaryotic UvrABC proteins to determine their relative NER incision efficiencies. We report here comparisons of relative NER efficiencies with a set of stereoisomeric DNA lesions derived from metabolites of benzo[a]pyrene and equine estrogens in different sequence contexts, utilizing 21 samples. We found a general qualitative trend toward similar relative NER incision efficiencies for ∼65% of these substrates; the other cases deviate mostly by ∼30% or less from a perfect correlation, although several more distant outliers are also evident. This resemblance is consistent with the hypothesis that lesion recognition through β-hairpin insertion, a common feature of the two systems, is facilitated by local thermodynamic destabilization induced by the lesions in both cases. In the case of the UvrABC system, varying the nature of the UvrC endonuclease, while maintaining the same UvrA/B proteins, can markedly affect the relative incision efficiencies. These observations suggest that, in addition to recognition involving the initial modified duplexes, downstream events involving UvrC can also play a role in distinguishing and processing different lesions in prokaryotic NER.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairBacillusBacterial ProteinsDNADNA AdductsDNA-Binding ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNucleic Acid ConformationProtein Structure, TertiaryStereoisomerismBacterial ProteinsDNADNA AdductsDNA-Binding ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesendodeoxyribonuclease uvrABCEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21741328
PMCPMC3212938
OpenAlexW1981517564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.