Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21740582›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2011

Evaluating RNAlater® as a preservative for using near-infrared spectroscopy to predict Anopheles gambiae age and species.

Maggy Sikulu, Kayla M Dowell, Leon E Hugo, Robert A Wirtz, Kristin Michel, Kamaranga H S Peiris, Sarah Moore, Gerry F Killeen, Floyd E Dowell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Maggy SikuluGriffith University, QLD, Australia.
Kayla M Dowell
Leon E Hugo
Robert A Wirtz
Kristin Michel
Kamaranga H S Peiris
Sarah Moore
Gerry F Killeen
Floyd E Dowell
Center for Grain and Animal Health Research · USKansas State University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USGriffith University · AULiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

TRANSEPITHELIAL ION TRANSPORT &ITS REGULATIONP20RR017686 · NCRR · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MELGAREJO GARCIA, LUIS TONATIUH · 2002 to 2011
$21.8M
NCRR NIH HHS P20RR017686Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMosquito age and species identification is a crucial determinant of the efficacy of vector control programmes. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has previously been applied successfully to rapidly, non-destructively, and simultaneously determine the age and species of freshly anesthetized African malaria vectors from the Anopheles gambiae s.l. species complex: An. gambiae s. s. and Anopheles arabiensis. However, this has only been achieved on freshly-collected specimens and future applications will require samples to be preserved between field collections and scanning by NIRS. In this study, a sample preservation method (RNAlater(®)) was evaluated for mosquito age and species identification by NIRS against scans of fresh samples.

methodsTwo strains of An. gambiae s.s. (CDC and G3) and two strains of An. arabiensis (Dongola, KGB) were reared in the laboratory while the third strain of An. arabiensis (Ifakara) was reared in a semi-field system. All mosquitoes were scanned when fresh and rescanned after preservation in RNAlater(®) for several weeks. Age and species identification was determined using a cross-validation.

resultsThe mean accuracy obtained for predicting the age of young (<7 days) or old (≥ 7 days) of all fresh (n = 633) and all preserved (n = 691) mosquito samples using the cross-validation technique was 83% and 90%, respectively. For species identification, accuracies were 82% for fresh against 80% for RNAlater(®) preserved. For both analyses, preserving mosquitoes in RNAlater(®) was associated with a highly significant reduction in the likelihood of a misclassification of mosquitoes as young or old using NIRS. Important to note is that the costs for preserving mosquito specimens with RNAlater(®) ranges from 3-13 cents per insect depending on the size of the tube used and the number of specimens pooled in one tube.

conclusionRNAlater(®) can be used to preserve mosquitoes for subsequent scanning and analysis by NIRS to determine their age and species with minimal costs and with accuracy similar to that achieved from fresh insects. Cold storage availability allows samples to be stored longer than a week after field collection. Further study to develop robust calibrations applicable to other strains from diverse ecological settings is recommended.

Indexed as

Disease VectorsAnimalsAnophelesEntomologyPreservation, BiologicalSpectroscopy, Near-Infrared

Identifiers

PMID21740582
PMCPMC3157445
OpenAlexW2148011556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.