Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21739614›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental neurobiology2011

Biophysics of substrate interaction: influence on neural motility, differentiation, and repair.

Simon W Moore, Michael P Sheetz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental neurobiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. EngineeringAPL bioengineering · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. The Future of Neuroscience: Flexible and Wireless Implantable Neural Electronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. A Tale of Two States: Normal and Transformed, With and Without Rigidity Sensing.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon W MooreDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, Sherman Fairchild Center, Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA. sm3030@columbia.edu
Michael P Sheetz
Columbia University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of mechanical transduction in the guidance of neuronal axonsK99NS075135 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI MOORE, SIMON WAYNE · 2011 to 2012
$214k
NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS075135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identity and behavior of a cell is shaped by the molecular and mechanical composition of its surroundings. Molecular cues have firmly established roles in guiding both neuronal fate decisions and the migration of cells and axons. However, there is growing evidence that topographical and rigidity cues in the extracellular environment act synergistically with these molecular cues. Like chemical cues, physical factors do not elicit a fixed response, but rather one that depends on the sensory makeup of the cell. Moreover, from developmental studies and the plasticity of neural tissue, it is evident that there is dynamic feedback between physical and chemical factors to produce the final morphology. Here, we focus on our current understanding of how these physical cues shape cellular differentiation and migration, and discuss their relevance to repairing the injured nervous system.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell MovementCellular MicroenvironmentExtracellular MatrixHumansNerve RegenerationNervous SystemSensory Receptor CellsSubstrate Specificity

Identifiers

PMID21739614
PMCPMC3307797
OpenAlexW2166167719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.