Embracing the unique role of genetic counselors: response to the commentary by Madeo et al.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Disability, Genetic Counseling, and Medical Education: From Eugenics to Anti-Ableism.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2025
   Review
2. Current and cutting-edge interventions for the treatment of obese patients.European journal of radiology · 2017
   Review
3. Attitudes of mothers of children with down syndrome towards noninvasive prenatal testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014
   Article
4. Are genetic counselors and the social service system for people with intellectual disability reaching rapprochement?Journal of genetic counseling · 2012
   Article
5. The road less traveled: one genetic counselor's reflections on disability and the genetic counseling profession.Journal of genetic counseling · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: a commentary.2011

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as