Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21739306›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2012

Improved outcome of Henoch-Schonlein purpura nephritis by early intensive treatment.

Fang Deng, Ling Lu, Qin Zhang, Bo Hu, Xun Xia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fang DengDepartment of Pediatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No.218 Ji-Xi Road, Hefei 230022, Anhui, China.
Ling Lu
Qin Zhang
Bo Hu
Xun Xia
Anhui Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the different therapies used to treat mild, moderate and severe Henoch-Schonlein purpura nephritis (HSPN) patients and to identify the most effective treatment.

methodsOne hundred and eighty six children were evaluated retrospectively. They were divided into mild, moderate and severe condition groups. Different therapeutic protocols of non-steroid therapy, hydrocortisone sodium succinate (HCSS) therapy, methylprednisolone (MP) pulse therapy, and MP in combination with tripterygium glycoside (TG) therapy were used to treat the different groups.

resultsAfter 4 wk, in the mild group, patients were more likely to respond to HCSS therapy than non-steroid therapy (P < 0.05). Moderate HSPN patients were more likely to respond to MP therapy than HCSS therapy (P < 0.05). Severe HSPN patients were more likely to respond to MP in combination with TG than single MP therapy (P < 0.05). At last follow-up, all children had normal urinalysis, blood pressure and serum urea and creatinine. In the mild group, the mean duration of proteinuria was shorter in HCSS therapy group than in non-steroid therapy group (P < 0.05). In the moderate group, the mean duration of proteinuria was shorter in MP pulse therapy group than in HCSS therapy group (P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe present study has demonstrated a superior effect of HCSS therapy in patients with mild HSPN disease, of MP therapy in patients with moderate disease, and of MP in combination with TG therapy in patients with severe disease. Intensive therapy administered initially reduces the duration of urinary protein abnormality.

Indexed as

ChildFemaleHumansIgA VasculitisMaleNephritisRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21739306
OpenAlexW1973434711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.