ArticlePloS one2011
Characterization of protein-protein interaction interfaces from a single species.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- A simple probabilistic AlphaFold interaction score.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- An Orthogonal Supramolecular Approach toward Protein Binding and Protein Sensing Using Dendrimers as Scaffolds for the Noncovalent Assembly of Binding and Sensing Groups.ACS materials Au · 2025Article
- Evaluation of an Affinity-Enhanced Anti-SARS-CoV2 Nanobody Design Workflow Using Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Picking the tyrosine-lock: chemical synthesis of the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase I inhibitor recifin A and analogues.Chemical science · 2024Article
- Predictive Models and Impact of Interfacial Contacts and Amino Acids on Protein-Protein Binding Affinity.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Molecular recognition of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with three essential partners: exploring possible immune escape mechanisms of viral mutants.Journal of molecular modeling · 2023Article
- Cold spots are universal in protein-protein interactions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
- Recifin A, Initial Example of the Tyr-Lock Peptide Structural Family, Is a Selective Allosteric Inhibitor of Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase I.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2020Article
- Interaction of Isocitrate Lyase with Proteins Involved in the Energetic Metabolism inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Asparagine and Glutamine Side-Chains and Ladders in HET-s(218-289) Amyloid Fibrils Studied by Fast Magic-Angle Spinning NMR.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- Protein-RNA interactions: structural characteristics and hotspot amino acids.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- PD-L1 Nanobody Competitively Inhibits the Formation of the PD-1/PD-L1 Complex: Comparative Molecular Dynamics Simulations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Non-interacting proteins may resemble interacting proteins: prevalence and implications.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Multiple Domain Associations within the Arabidopsis Immune Receptor RPP1 Regulate the Activation of Programmed Cell Death.PLoS pathogens · 2016Article
- Binding interface change and cryptic variation in the evolution of protein-protein interactions.BMC evolutionary biology · 2016Article
- Progress and challenges in predicting protein interfaces.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Review
- Article
- Predicting the Effect of Mutations on Protein-Protein Binding Interactions through Structure-Based Interface Profiles.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Article
- On the packing density of the unbound protein-protein interaction interface and its implications in dynamics.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most proteins attain their biological functions through specific interactions with other proteins. Thus, the study of protein-protein interactions and the interfaces that mediate these interactions is of prime importance for the understanding of biological function. In particular the precise determinants of binding specificity and their contributions to binding energy within protein interfaces are not well understood. In order to better understand these determinants an appropriate description of the interaction surface is needed. Available data from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae allow us to focus on a single species and to use all the available structures, correcting for redundancy, instead of using structural representatives. This allows us to control for potentially confounding factors that may affect sequence propensities. We find a significant contribution of main-chain atoms to protein-protein interactions. These include interactions both with other main-chain and side-chain atoms on the interacting chain. We find that the type of interaction depends on both amino acid and secondary structure type involved in the contact. For example, residues in α-helices and large amino acids are the most likely to be involved in interactions through their side-chain atoms. We find an intriguing homogeneity when calculating the average solvation energy of different areas of the protein surface. Unexpectedly, homo- and hetero-complexes have quite similar results for all analyses. Our findings demonstrate that the manner in which protein-protein interactions are formed is determined by the residue type and the secondary structure found in the interface. However the homogeneity of the desolvation energy despite heterogeneity of interface properties suggests a complex relationship between interface composition and binding energy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.