Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21738486›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

Maps of open chromatin guide the functional follow-up of genome-wide association signals: application to hematological traits.

Dirk S Paul, James P Nisbet, Tsun-Po Yang, Stuart Meacham, Augusto Rendon, Katta Hautaviita, Jonna Tallila, Jacqui White, Marloes R Tijssen, Suthesh Sivapalaratnam and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Multiple functional variants in long-range enhancer elements contribute to the risk of SNP rs965513 in thyroid cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Functional interpretation of non-coding sequence variation: concepts and challenges.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dirk S PaulWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom. dp5@sanger.ac.uk
James P Nisbet
Tsun-Po Yang
Stuart Meacham
Augusto Rendon
Katta Hautaviita
Jonna Tallila
Jacqui White
Marloes R Tijssen
Suthesh Sivapalaratnam
Hanneke Basart
Mieke D Trip
Cardiogenics Consortium
MuTHER Consortium
Berthold Göttgens
Nicole Soranzo
Willem H Ouwehand
Panos Deloukas
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBAcademic Medical Center · NLNHS Blood and Transplant · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/08/014/24067British Heart Foundation RG/09/012/28096British Heart Foundation RG/09/12/28096Medical Research Council G0800784Medical Research Council G0900339Medical Research Council MC_U105260799National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research G0900729/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 081917/Z/07/ZWellcome Trust 091746/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Turning genetic discoveries identified in genome-wide association (GWA) studies into biological mechanisms is an important challenge in human genetics. Many GWA signals map outside exons, suggesting that the associated variants may lie within regulatory regions. We applied the formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements (FAIRE) method in a megakaryocytic and an erythroblastoid cell line to map active regulatory elements at known loci associated with hematological quantitative traits, coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction. We showed that the two cell types exhibit distinct patterns of open chromatin and that cell-specific open chromatin can guide the finding of functional variants. We identified an open chromatin region at chromosome 7q22.3 in megakaryocytes but not erythroblasts, which harbors the common non-coding sequence variant rs342293 known to be associated with platelet volume and function. Resequencing of this open chromatin region in 643 individuals provided strong evidence that rs342293 is the only putative causative variant in this region. We demonstrated that the C- and G-alleles differentially bind the transcription factor EVI1 affecting PIK3CG gene expression in platelets and macrophages. A protein-protein interaction network including up- and down-regulated genes in Pik3cg knockout mice indicated that PIK3CG is associated with gene pathways with an established role in platelet membrane biogenesis and thrombus formation. Thus, rs342293 is the functional common variant at this locus; to the best of our knowledge this is the first such variant to be elucidated among the known platelet quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Our data suggested a molecular mechanism by which a non-coding GWA index SNP modulates platelet phenotype.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsBlood PlateletsChromatinChromosomes, Human, Pair 7Class Ib Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinaseDNA-Binding ProteinsErythroblastsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMacrophagesMDS1 and EVI1 Complex Locus ProteinMegakaryocytesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLChromatinClass Ib Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinaseDNA-Binding ProteinsMDS1 and EVI1 Complex Locus ProteinMECOM protein, humanPIK3CG protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21738486
PMCPMC3128100
OpenAlexW2170844153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.