Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21738453›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2011

Activated membrane patches guide chemotactic cell motility.

Inbal Hecht, Monica L Skoge, Pascale G Charest, Eshel Ben-Jacob, Richard A Firtel, William F Loomis, Herbert Levine, Wouter-Jan Rappel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tools for computational analysis of moving boundary problems in cellular mechanobiology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. A minimal computational model for three-dimensional cell migration.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Excitable Signal Transduction Networks in Directed Cell Migration.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Signaling networks that regulate cell migration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Inbal HechtCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America. inbal.hecht@gmail.com
Monica L Skoge
Pascale G Charest
Eshel Ben-Jacob
Richard A Firtel
William F Loomis
Herbert Levine
Wouter-Jan Rappel
University of California, San Diego · USCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics · USTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

Project 5P01GM078586 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI RAPPEL, WOUTER-JAN · 2007 to 2016
$11.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM078586NIGMS NIH HHS P01GM078586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many eukaryotic cells are able to crawl on surfaces and guide their motility based on environmental cues. These cues are interpreted by signaling systems which couple to cell mechanics; indeed membrane protrusions in crawling cells are often accompanied by activated membrane patches, which are localized areas of increased concentration of one or more signaling components. To determine how these patches are related to cell motion, we examine the spatial localization of RasGTP in chemotaxing Dictyostelium discoideum cells under conditions where the vertical extent of the cell was restricted. Quantitative analyses of the data reveal a high degree of spatial correlation between patches of activated Ras and membrane protrusions. Based on these findings, we formulate a model for amoeboid cell motion that consists of two coupled modules. The first module utilizes a recently developed two-component reaction diffusion model that generates transient and localized areas of elevated concentration of one of the components along the membrane. The activated patches determine the location of membrane protrusions (and overall cell motion) that are computed in the second module, which also takes into account the cortical tension and the availability of protrusion resources. We show that our model is able to produce realistic amoeboid-like motion and that our numerical results are consistent with experimentally observed pseudopod dynamics. Specifically, we show that the commonly observed splitting of pseudopods can result directly from the dynamics of the signaling patches.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell MovementChemotaxisComputer SimulationDictyosteliumGuanosine TriphosphateMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesPseudopodiaras ProteinsSignal TransductionSingle-Cell AnalysisGuanosine Triphosphateras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21738453
PMCPMC3127810
OpenAlexW2051277229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.