Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21737465›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2011

Steroid hormone modulation of RET through two estrogen responsive enhancers in breast cancer.

Zachary E Stine, David M McGaughey, Seneca L Bessling, Shengchao Li, Andrew S McCallion

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Ret Receptor Has Distinct Alterations and Functions in Breast Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary E StineMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
David M McGaughey
Seneca L Bessling
Shengchao Li
Andrew S McCallion
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Development of a Neuronal Regulatory LexiconR01NS062972 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCCALLION, ANDREW S · 2009 to 2018
$4.1M
Genetics of Disease Gene RegulationR01GM071648 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCCALLION, ANDREW S · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071648NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS062972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RET, a gene causatively mutated in Hirschsprung disease and cancer, has recently been implicated in breast cancer estrogen (E2) independence and tamoxifen resistance. RET displays both E2 and retinoic acid (RA)-dependent transcriptional modulation in E2-responsive breast cancers. However, the regulatory elements through which the steroid hormone transcriptional regulation of RET is mediated are poorly defined. Recent genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation-based studies have identified 10 putative E2 receptor-alpha (ESR1) and RA receptor alpha-binding sites at the RET locus, of which we demonstrate only two (RET -49.8 and RET +32.8) display significant E2 regulatory response when assayed independently in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. We demonstrate that endogenous RET expression and RET -49.8 regulatory activity are cooperatively regulated by E2 and RA in breast cancer cells. We identify key sequences that are required for RET -49.8 and RET +32.8 E2 responsiveness, including motifs known to be bound by ESR1, FOXA1 and TFAP2C. We also report that both RET -49.8 regulatory activity and endogenous RET expression are completely dependent on ESR1 for their (E2)-induction and that ESR1 is sufficient to mediate the E2-induced enhancer activity of RET -49.8 and RET +32.8. Finally, using zebrafish transgenesis, we also demonstrate that RET -49.8 directs reporter expression in the central nervous system and peripheral nervous system consistent with the endogenous ret expression. Taken collectively, these data suggest that RET transcription in breast cancer cells is modulated by E2 via ESR1 acting on multiple elements collectively.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticResponse ElementsAnimalsBinding SitesBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogensFemaleHumansMaleProtein BindingProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retTretinoinESR1 protein, humanEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogensProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRET protein, humanTretinoin

Identifiers

PMID21737465
PMCPMC3168285
OpenAlexW2151341838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.