ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2011
Use of polyphase continuous excitation based on the Frank sequence in EPR.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards reduction of SAR in scaling up in vivo pulsed EPR imaging to larger objects.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2019Article
- The world as viewed by and with unpaired electrons.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2012Article
- Digital EPR with an arbitrary waveform generator and direct detection at the carrier frequency.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2011Article
- Rapid frequency scan EPR.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polyphase continuous excitation based on the Frank sequence is suggested as an alternative to single pulse excitation in EPR. The method allows reduction of the source power, while preserving the excitation bandwidth of a single pulse. For practical EPR implementation the use of a cross-loop resonator is essential to provide isolation between the spin system and the resonator responses to the excitation. Provided that a line broadening of about 5% is acceptable, the cumulative turning angle of the magnetization vector generated by the excitation sequence can be quite large and can produce signal amplitudes that are comparable to that achieved with a higher power 90° pulse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.