Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21735419›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Anticonvulsants for tinnitus.

Carlijn El Hoekstra, Sybren P Rynja, Gijsbert A van Zanten, Maroeska M Rovers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. A multidisciplinary systematic review of the treatment for chronic idiopathic tinnitus.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Sound therapy (masking) in the management of tinnitus in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Antidepressants for patients with tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  7. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  8. Efficacy of Nortriptyline-Topiramate and Verapamil-Paroxetine in Tinnitus Management: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Oral gabapentin and intradermal injection of lidocaine: is there any role in the treatment of moderate/severe tinnitus?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2015
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The Current State of Tinnitus Diagnosis and Treatment: a Multidisciplinary Expert Perspective.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. A proposed association between subjective nonpulsatile tinnitus and migraine.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2023
    Review
  20. Tinnitus Guidelines and Their Evidence Base.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlijn El HoekstraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, G05.127, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CX.
Sybren P Rynja
Gijsbert A van Zanten
Maroeska M Rovers
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTinnitus is the perception of sound or noise in the absence of an external or internal acoustic stimulation. It is a common and potentially distressing symptom for which no adequate therapy exists.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of anticonvulsants in patients with chronic tinnitus. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (2010, Issue 2), MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the most recent search was 26 May 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised controlled trials in patients with chronic tinnitus comparing orally administered anticonvulsants with placebo. The primary outcome was improvement in tinnitus measured with validated questionnaires. Secondary outcomes were improvement in tinnitus measured with self-assessment scores, improvement in global well-being or accompanying symptoms, and adverse drug effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors assessed risk of bias and extracted data independently. MAIN

resultsSeven trials (453 patients) were included in this review. These studies investigated four different anticonvulsants: gabapentin, carbamazepine, lamotrigine and flunarizine. The risk of bias of most studies was 'high' or 'unclear'. Three studies included a validated questionnaire (primary outcome). None of them showed a significant positive effect of anticonvulsants. One study showed a significant negative effect of gabapentin compared to placebo with an increase in Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) score of 18.4 points (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 1.58). A second study showed a positive, non-significant effect of gabapentin with a difference compared to placebo of 2.4 points on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.25). When the data from these two studies are pooled no effect of gabapentin is found (SMD 0.07, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.40). A third study reported no differences on the THI after treatment with gabapentin compared to placebo (exact numbers could not be extracted from the article).A meta-analysis of 'any positive effect' (yes versus no) based on a self-assessment score (secondary outcome) showed a small favourable effect of anticonvulsants (RD 14%, 95% CI 6% to 22%). A meta-analysis of 'near or total eradication of tinnitus annoyance' showed no effect of anticonvulsants (risk difference (RD) 4%, 95% CI -2% to 11%). Side effects of the anticonvulsants used were experienced by 18% of patients. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCurrent evidence regarding the effectiveness of anticonvulsants in patients with tinnitus has significant risk of bias. There is no evidence from studies performed so far to show that anticonvulsants have a large positive effect in the treatment of tinnitus but a small effect (of doubtful clinical significance) has been demonstrated.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAminesAnticonvulsantsCarbamazepineChronic DiseaseCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsFlunarizineGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansLamotrigineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTinnitusTriazinesAminesAnticonvulsantsCarbamazepineCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsFlunarizineGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidLamotrigineTriazines

Identifiers

PMID21735419
PMCPMC6599822
OpenAlexW2147323138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.