SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of insulin glargine with NPH insulin, premixed insulin preparations or with insulin detemir in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Acta diabetologica · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Basal supplementation of insulin lispro protamine suspension versus insulin glargine and detemir for type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Diabetes care · 2012Pooled it
- Trial
- Association between glucose-lowering drugs and circulating insulin antibodies induced by insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.World journal of diabetes · 2024Article
- Human Insulin as an Antidote to the High Cost of Insulin: Clinical Insignificance of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Differences.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Review of the Evolution of Insulin Development and Its Delivery Method.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- One hundred years of insulin therapy.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2021Review
- Adverse Effects of Glycemia-Lowering Medications in Type 2 Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2019Review
- Challenges of Diabetes Care in Older People With Type 2 Diabetes and the Role of Basal Insulin.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2019Article
- Appropriate Titration of Basal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes and the Potential Role of the Pharmacist.Advances in therapy · 2019Review
- Evaluation of Unit Equivalency of Insulin Glargine to Insulin Detemir in an Acute Care Setting.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2018Article
- Effectiveness and safety of insulin glargineTherapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2018Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL versus 100 U/mL in Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Journal of diabetes research · 2018Review
- COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF GLARGINE AND DETEMIR INSULIN IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INPATIENT HYPERGLYCEMIA AND DIABETES.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2017Article
- Substitutes of Prescription Medicines - A Review of Concerns Relevant to Doctors and Patients.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017Review
- Comparison of Insulin Detemir and Insulin Glargine for Hospitalized Patients on a Basal-Bolus Protocol.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Real-world medication persistence and outcomes associated with basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist free-dose combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes in the US.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2017 · on this mapArticle
- Rates and predictors of hypoglycaemia in 27 585 people from 24 countries with insulin-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes: the global HAT study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2016Observational
- The impact of basal insulin analogues on glucose variability in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease.International urology and nephrology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronically elevated blood glucose levels are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Many diabetes patients will eventually require insulin treatment to maintain good glycaemic control. There are still uncertainties about the optimal insulin treatment regimens for type 2 diabetes, but the long-acting insulin analogues seem beneficial. Several reviews have compared either insulin detemir or insulin glargine to NPH insulin, but research directly comparing both insulin analogues is limited.
objectivesTo assess the effects of insulin detemir and insulin glargine compared with each other in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, online registries of ongoing trials and abstract books. Date of last search was January 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine with a duration of 12 weeks or longer were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected the studies and extracted the data. Pooling of studies by means of random-effects meta-analysis was performed. MAIN
resultsThis review examined four trials lasting 24 to 52 weeks involving 2250 people randomised to either insulin detemir or glargine. Overall, risk of bias of the evaluated studies was high. Insulin glargine was dosed once-daily in the evening. Insulin detemir was initiated once-daily in the evening with the option of an additional dose in the morning in three studies and initiated twice-daily in one study. Of randomised patients 13.6% to 57.2% were injecting insulin detemir twice-daily at the end of trial.Glycaemic control, measured by glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and HbA1c equal to or less than 7% with or without hypoglycaemia, did not differ statistically significantly between treatment groups.The results showed no significant differences in overall, nocturnal and severe hypoglycaemia between treatment groups.Insulin detemir was associated with less weight gain. Treatment with insulin glargine resulted in a lower daily basal insulin dose and a lower number of injection site reactions.There was no significant difference in the variability of FPG or glucose values in 24-hour profiles between treatment groups. It was not possible to draw conclusions on quality of life, costs or mortality. Only one trial reported results on health-related quality of life and showed no significant differences between treatment groups. AUTHORS'
conclusionsOur analyses suggest that there is no clinically relevant difference in efficacy or safety between insulin detemir and insulin glargine for targeting hyperglycaemia. However, to achieve the same glycaemic control insulin detemir was often injected twice-daily in a higher dose but with less weight gain, while insulin glargine was injected once-daily, with somewhat fewer injection site reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.