Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21735384›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Beta2-agonists for acute bronchitis.

Lorne A Becker, Jeffrey Hom, Miguel Villasis-Keever, Johannes C van der Wouden

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02349919 (Effect of Oral Procaterol on Chronic Persistent Cough Following Upper Respiratory Tract Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02349919 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Oral Procaterol on Chronic Persistent Cough Following Upper Respiratory Tract Infection: Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2015 to 2018Enrolled74ConditionsCoughArmsProcaterol, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beta2-agonists for acute cough or a clinical diagnosis of acute bronchitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Medication use in European primary care patients with lower respiratory tract infection: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Observational
  10. Antitussive drugs--past, present, and future.Pharmacological reviews · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lorne A BeckerDepartment of Family Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 475 Irving Ave, Suite 200, Syracuse, NY, USA, 13210.
Jeffrey Hom
Miguel Villasis-Keever
Johannes C van der Wouden
Erasmus MC · NLMexican Social Security Institute · MXNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no clearly effective treatments for the cough of acute bronchitis. Beta2-agonists are often prescribed, perhaps because clinicians suspect many patients also have reversible airflow restriction contributing to the symptoms.

objectivesTo determine whether beta2-agonists improve acute bronchitis symptoms in patients with no underlying pulmonary disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2011, issue 1 which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to February week 1, 2011) and EMBASE (1974 to February 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which patients (adults, or children over two years of age) with acute bronchitis or acute cough and without known pulmonary disease were allocated to beta2-agonist versus placebo, no treatment or alternative treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently selected outcomes and extracted data while blinded to study results. Two review authors independently assessed each trial for risk of bias. We analysed trials in children and adults separately. MAIN

resultsTwo trials in children (n = 109) with no evidence of airway obstruction did not find any benefits from oral beta2-agonists. Five trials in adults (n = 418) had mixed results but overall summary statistics did not reveal any significant benefits from oral (three trials) nor inhaled (two trials) beta2-agonists. There were no significant differences in daily cough scores nor in the percentage of adults still coughing after seven days (control group 73%; risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 1.09). in one trial, subgroups with evidence of airflow limitation had lower symptom scores if given beta2-agonists. The trials that noted quicker resolution of cough with beta2-agonists were those with a higher proportion of wheezing patients at baseline. Adults given beta2-agonists were more likely to report tremor, shakiness or nervousness (RR 7.94, 95% CI 1.17 to 53.94; number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) 2.3). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is no evidence to support the use of beta2-agonists in children with acute cough who do not have evidence of airflow obstruction. There is also little evidence that the routine use of beta2-agonists is helpful for adults with acute cough. These agents may reduce symptoms, including cough, in people with evidence of airflow obstruction. However, this potential benefit is not well-supported by the available data and must be weighed against the adverse effects associated with their use.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAdultAirway ObstructionBronchitisBronchodilator AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCoughHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID21735384
OpenAlexW1927096462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.