Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21735356›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2012

Predicting the effects of chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus by induction chemotherapy response assessed by positron emission tomography: toward PET-response-guided selection of chemoradiotherapy or esophagectomy.

Ryu Ishihara, Sachiko Yamamoto, Hiroyasu Iishi, Kengo Nagai, Fumi Matui, Natsuko Kawada, Takashi Ohta, Hiromitsu Kanzaki, Masao Hanafusa, Noboru Hanaoka and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Prognostic values of mid-radiotherapyRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2019
    Article
  6. Molecular and clinical oncology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The value ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryu IshiharaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, 3-3 Nakamichi 1-chome, Higashinari-ku, Osaka, 537-8511, Japan. isihara-ry@mc.pref.osaka.jp
Sachiko Yamamoto
Hiroyasu Iishi
Kengo Nagai
Fumi Matui
Natsuko Kawada
Takashi Ohta
Hiromitsu Kanzaki
Masao Hanafusa
Noboru Hanaoka
Yoji Takeuchi
Koji Higashino
Noriya Uedo
Naotoshi Sugimoto
Yoshifumi Kawaguchi
Kinji Nishiyama
Masaaki Motoori
Masahiko Yano
Takuya Hosoki
Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPMorinomiya Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe have developed a treatment protocol for esophageal cancer involving a single course of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to determine if it was possible to predict the effects of chemoradiotherapy on the basis of the response to induction chemotherapy, assessed by positron emission tomography (PET).

methodsSixteen patients with Stage II-IVA esophageal cancer were treated using this protocol from April 2007 to July 2010. Chemotherapy involved a fluorouracil and platinum-based combination regimen. All patients received PET scans before and 12-24 days after the beginning of induction chemotherapy. Associations between the response to induction chemotherapy assessed by PET and the effects of chemoradiotherapy were evaluated.

resultsInduction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy resulted in complete response (CR) in 10 of the 16 patients. The reduction in maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) was 58 ± 12% in patients with CR (n = 10), compared with 14 ± 16% in patients without CR (n = 6) (P < 0.0001). Using a cut-off value of 55% for SUV(max) reduction rate, eight of 10 cancers with CR and six of six cancers without CR were correctly identified, providing a sensitivity and specificity of 80 and 100%, respectively. The overall 1-year survival rates for patients with an SUV(max) reduction rate >55% (responders) were 100%, compared with 60% for patients with an SUV(max) reduction rate ≤55% (non-responders), respectively.

conclusionsThe response to a single course of induction therapy assessed by PET was significantly associated with the effects of chemoradiotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission Tomography

Identifiers

PMID21735356
OpenAlexW2035215950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.