ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2011
Inappropriate angiogenic response as a novel mechanism of duodenal ulceration and impaired healing.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 as a Therapy and Safety Key: A Special Beneficial Pleiotropic Effect Controlling and Modulating Angiogenesis and the NO-System.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Can serum progranulin levels be a biomarker following gastric ulcer therapy?Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2018Article
- STAT3 and importins are novel mediators of early molecular and cellular responses in experimental duodenal ulceration.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite recent advances and better understanding of the etiology and the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal ulcer diseases, e.g., duodenal ulcer, the molecular events leading to ulcer development, delayed healing, and recurrence remain poorly elucidated.
aimsAfter we found that duodenal ulcers did not heal despite increased levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), we tested the hypothesis that an imbalance in angiogenic VEGF and anti-angiogenic endostatin and angiostatin might be important in the development and delayed healing of experimental duodenal ulcers.
methodsLevels of VEGF, endostatin, and angiostatin, and the expression and activity of related matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 2 and 9 were measured in scrapings of rat proximal duodenal mucosa in the early and late stages of chemically induced duodenal ulceration. Furthermore, animals were treated with recombinant endostatin and MMP 2 inhibitor to test the relationship between MMP2 and endostatin and their involvement in healing of experimental duodenal ulcers.
resultsA concurrent increase of duodenal VEGF, endostatin, and angiostatin was noted during duodenal ulceration. Endostatin treatment aggravated duodenal ulcer. Levels of MMP2, but not MMP9, were increased. Inhibition of MMP2 reduced levels of endostatin and angiostatin, and attenuated duodenal ulcers.
conclusionsIncreased levels of endostatin and angiostatin induced by MMP2 delayed healing of duodenal ulcers despite concurrently increased VEGF. Thus, an inappropriate angiogenic response or "angiogenic imbalance" may be an important new mechanism in ulcer development and impaired healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.