ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2011
The elusive definition of pandemic influenza.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 189 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cohort-resolved excess mortality in Germany (2000-2024): Patterns and implications for the SARS-CoV-2 era.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Scabbard of Excalibur: An Allegory on the Role of an Efficient and Effective Healthcare System under Universal Health Coverage during the Pandemic Response.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cancer Care Team Functioning during COVID-19: A Narrative Literature Review and Synthesis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- COVID-19 and flu vaccination in Romania, post pandemic lessons in healthcare workers and general population.PloS one · 2024Observational
- Reports of deaths are an exaggeration: all-cause and NAA-test-conditional mortality in Germany during the SARS-CoV-2 era.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Public health agencies' use of social media for communication during pandemics: a scoping review of the literature.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2023Article
- Lost Lessons of the 1918 Influenza: The 1920s Working Hypothesis, the Public Health Paradigm, and the Prevention of Deadly Pandemics.American journal of public health · 2022Article
- Article
- An in-depth analysis of 10 epidemiological terminologies used in the context of COVID-19.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2022Article
- The end of the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of clinical investigation · 2022Article
- A Pandemic Risk Perception Scale.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2022Review
- A rapid review investigating the potential impact of a pandemic on the mental health of young people aged 12-25 years.Irish journal of psychological medicine · 2021Review
- Burnout of Physicians, Pharmacists and Nurses in the Course of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Serbian Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Observational
- Peritraumatic Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Seoul, South Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The effect of the definition of 'pandemic' on quantitative assessments of infectious disease outbreak risk.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Lessons learned and questions raised during and post-COVID-19 anthropopause period in relation to the environment and climate.Environment, development and sustainability · 2021Article
- Rapid Response to Pandemic Threats: Immunogenic Epitope Detection of Pandemic Pathogens for Diagnostics and Vaccine Development Using Peptide Microarrays.Journal of proteome research · 2020Review
- The rise and evolution of COVID-19.International journal of women's dermatology · 2020Review
- Vaccine confidence: the keys to restoring trust.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
- Did the hesitancy in declaring COVID-19 a pandemic reflect a need to redefine the term?Lancet (London, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been considerable controversy over the past year, particularly in Europe, over whether the World Health Organization (WHO) changed its definition of pandemic influenza in 2009, after novel H1N1 influenza was identified. Some have argued that not only was the definition changed, but that it was done to pave the way for declaring a pandemic. Others claim that the definition was never changed and that this allegation is completely unfounded. Such polarized views have hampered our ability to draw important conclusions. This impasse, combined with concerns over potential conflicts of interest and doubts about the proportionality of the response to the H1N1 influenza outbreak, has undermined the public trust in health officials and our collective capacity to effectively respond to future disease threats. WHO did not change its definition of pandemic influenza for the simple reason that it has never formally defined pandemic influenza. While WHO has put forth many descriptions of pandemic influenza, it has never established a formal definition and the criteria for declaring a pandemic caused by the H1N1 virus derived from "pandemic phase" definitions, not from a definition of "pandemic influenza". The fact that despite ten years of pandemic preparedness activities no formal definition of pandemic influenza has been formulated reveals important underlying assumptions about the nature of this infectious disease. In particular, the limitations of "virus-centric" approaches merit further attention and should inform ongoing efforts to "learn lessons" that will guide the response to future outbreaks of novel infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.