Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21734643›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2011

Phosphorylation network rewiring by gene duplication.

Luca Freschi, Mathieu Courcelles, Pierre Thibault, Stephen W Michnick, Christian R Landry

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Selection maintains signaling function of a highly diverged intrinsically disordered region.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Protein abundance is key to distinguish promiscuous from functional phosphorylation based on evolutionary information.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Where do phosphosites come from and where do they go after gene duplication?International journal of evolutionary biology · 2012
    Article
  20. Comparative interaction networks: bridging genotype to phenotype.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca FreschiDépartement de Biologie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Mathieu Courcelles
Pierre Thibault
Stephen W Michnick
Christian R Landry

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research GMX-152556Canadian Institutes of Health Research GMX-191597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidating how complex regulatory networks have assembled during evolution requires a detailed understanding of the evolutionary dynamics that follow gene duplication events, including changes in post-translational modifications. We compared the phosphorylation profiles of paralogous proteins in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to that of a species that diverged from the budding yeast before the duplication of those genes. We found that 100 million years of post-duplication divergence are sufficient for the majority of phosphorylation sites to be lost or gained in one paralog or the other, with a strong bias toward losses. However, some losses may be partly compensated for by the evolution of other phosphosites, as paralogous proteins tend to preserve similar numbers of phosphosites over time. We also found that up to 50% of kinase-substrate relationships may have been rewired during this period. Our results suggest that after gene duplication, proteins tend to subfunctionalize at the level of post-translational regulation and that even when phosphosites are preserved, there is a turnover of the kinases that phosphorylate them.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGene Regulatory NetworksComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, FungalModels, MolecularPhosphorylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalReproducibility of ResultsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21734643
PMCPMC3159966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.