Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21734044›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2011

Direct and specific binding of the UL16 tegument protein of herpes simplex virus to the cytoplasmic tail of glycoprotein E.

Pei-Chun Yeh, Jun Han, Pooja Chadha, David G Meckes, Michael D Ward, O John Semmes, John W Wills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparative Analysis ofJournal of virology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pei-Chun YehDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Jun Han
Pooja Chadha
David G Meckes
Michael D Ward
O John Semmes
John W Wills

Funding

Molecular Functions and Mechanisms of UL16, A Conserved Tegument Protein of HSVR01AI071286 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI WILLS, JOHN W. · 2007 to 2016
$5.1M
VIRUSES AND CANCERT32CA060395 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI MEYERS, CRAIG M · 1994 to 2021
$4.3M
HTLV-I TAX MEDIATED DEREGULATION OF CELL STATER01CA076595 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI SEMMES, OLIVER JOHN · 1999 to 2016
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA076595NCI NIH HHS R01 CA76595NCI NIH HHS T32 CA060395NCI NIH HHS T32CA60395NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI071286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The UL16 tegument protein of herpes simplex virus (HSV) is conserved throughout all of the herpesvirus families. Previous studies have shown that the binding of HSV to heparan sulfate molecules on the host cell triggers the release of UL16 from the capsid, but the mechanism by which the signal is sent from the virion surface into the tegument is unknown. Here, we report that a glutathione S-transferase chimera bearing the cytoplasmic tail of viral glycoprotein E (gE) is capable of binding to UL16 in lysates of eukaryotic cells or purified from bacteria. Moreover, mass spectrometry studies of native-UL16 complexes purified from infected cells also revealed the presence of gE. Proof that UL16-gE can interact within cells required the fortuitous discovery of a mutant possessing only the first 155 residues of UL16. Confocal microscopy of cotransfected cells revealed that this mutant colocalized with gE in the cytoplasm, whereas it was found throughout the cytoplasm and nucleus when expressed alone. In contrast, the full-length UL16 molecule was very poorly capable of finding gE. Moreover, membrane flotation assays showed that UL16(1-155) was able to float to the top of sucrose step gradients when coexpressed with gE, whereas full-length UL16 was not. Thus, the discovery of the UL16(1-155) mutant confirmed the specific in vitro interaction with gE and provides evidence that a binding domain at the N terminus of UL16 may be controlled by a regulatory domain within the C terminus. These findings suggest the possibility that the UL16-gE interaction may play roles in the tegument signaling mechanism, virus budding, and the gE-mediated mechanism of cell-to-cell spread.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MappingAnimalsCell LineHerpesvirus 1, HumanHumansProtein BindingViral ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21734044
PMCPMC3165769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.