Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21733127›Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2011

Biotechnological uses of enzymes from psychrophiles.

R Cavicchioli, T Charlton, H Ertan, S Mohd Omar, K S Siddiqui, T J Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Genome Mining ofBiomolecules · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Expanding Diversity of Viruses from Extreme Environments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Catalase from the Antarctic FungusIndian journal of microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Communities of culturable freshwater fungi present in Antarctic lakes and detection of their low-temperature-active enzymes.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R CavicchioliSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. r.cavicchioli@unsw.edu.au
T Charlton
H Ertan
S Mohd Omar
K S Siddiqui
T J Williams

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bulk of the Earth's biosphere is cold (e.g. 90% of the ocean's waters are ≤ 5°C), sustaining a broad diversity of microbial life. The permanently cold environments vary from the deep ocean to alpine reaches and to polar regions. Commensurate with the extent and diversity of the ecosystems that harbour psychrophilic life, the functional capacity of the microorganisms that inhabitat the cold biosphere are equally diverse. As a result, indigenous psychrophilic microorganisms provide an enormous natural resource of enzymes that function effectively in the cold, and these cold-adapted enzymes have been targeted for their biotechnological potential. In this review we describe the main properties of enzymes from psychrophiles and describe some of their known biotechnological applications and ways to potentially improve their value for biotechnology. The review also covers the use of metagenomics for enzyme screening, the development of psychrophilic gene expression systems and the use of enzymes for cleaning.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyBiotechnologyCold TemperatureEnzymesEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID21733127
PMCPMC3815257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.