Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2011
Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 444 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Open-label Study of Dapagliflozin in Patients With or Without Type 2 Diabetes Admitted With Acute Heart Failure
Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Subjects With Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF)
Acute Effect of Recombinant Human Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Pulmonary Disease
Perioperative Recombinant Human Brain Natriuretic Peptide for Renal Protection in Cardiac Surgery: the PROTECT-CS Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
444 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,228 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in pharmacological treatment of heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.European heart journal · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of vasodilators for heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy and safety of recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide in the treatment of sepsis complicated by heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Heart Failure and All-Cause Hospitalizations in Patients With Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of different drugs in acute heart failure with renal dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Incidence, mortality, and predictors of acute kidney injury in patients with heart failure: a systematic review.ESC heart failure · 2023Pooled it
- Common Variants onCirculation. Heart failure · 2023Pooled it
- Hemoadsorption in Heart Failure Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Pooled it
- The efficacy of ginseng-containing traditional Chinese medicine in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Dyspnea Measurement in Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Evidence Map of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Low Reporting of Cointerventions in Recent Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Pooled it
- Nesiritide in patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure: a meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Pooled it
- Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors in hemodynamic congestion: a meta-analysis of early studies.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Pooled it
- Acute heart failure : An unmet medical need.Herz · 2019Pooled it
- Randomized double-blind clinical studies of ularitide and other vasoactive substances in acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2018Pooled it
- The NPR1 agonist antibody XXB750 in heart failure: a phase 2 randomized trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Renal Effects of Combination Phosphodiesterase V Inhibition and Low-Dose B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Acute Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Circulation. Heart failure · 2024Trial
- Impact of age on clinical outcomes and response to serelaxin in patients with acute heart failure: An analysis from the RELAX-AHF-2 trial.European journal of heart failure · 2024Trial
- Hydralazine combined with conventional therapy improved outcomes in severe systolic dysfunction and mitral regurgitation.ESC heart failure · 2024Trial
- [A nomogram based on systemic inflammation markers can predict adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2022Trial
384 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedWilson, W H [corrected to Tang, W H W]
Authors and funding
58 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNesiritide is approved in the United States for early relief of dyspnea in patients with acute heart failure. Previous meta-analyses have raised questions regarding renal toxicity and the mortality associated with this agent.
methodsWe randomly assigned 7141 patients who were hospitalized with acute heart failure to receive either nesiritide or placebo for 24 to 168 hours in addition to standard care. Coprimary end points were the change in dyspnea at 6 and 24 hours, as measured on a 7-point Likert scale, and the composite end point of rehospitalization for heart failure or death within 30 days.
resultsPatients randomly assigned to nesiritide, as compared with those assigned to placebo, more frequently reported markedly or moderately improved dyspnea at 6 hours (44.5% vs. 42.1%, P=0.03) and 24 hours (68.2% vs. 66.1%, P=0.007), but the prespecified level for significance (P≤0.005 for both assessments or P≤0.0025 for either) was not met. The rate of rehospitalization for heart failure or death from any cause within 30 days was 9.4% in the nesiritide group versus 10.1% in the placebo group (absolute difference, -0.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.1 to 0.7; P=0.31). There were no significant differences in rates of death from any cause at 30 days (3.6% with nesiritide vs. 4.0% with placebo; absolute difference, -0.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.3 to 0.5) or rates of worsening renal function, defined by more than a 25% decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (31.4% vs. 29.5%; odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.21; P=0.11).
conclusionsNesiritide was not associated with an increase or a decrease in the rate of death and rehospitalization and had a small, nonsignificant effect on dyspnea when used in combination with other therapies. It was not associated with a worsening of renal function, but it was associated with an increase in rates of hypotension. On the basis of these results, nesiritide cannot be recommended for routine use in the broad population of patients with acute heart failure. (Funded by Scios; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00475852.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.