Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21732664›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2011

Detection of environmentally persistent free radicals at a superfund wood treating site.

Albert Leo N dela Cruz, William Gehling, Slawomir Lomnicki, Robert Cook, Barry Dellinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigating environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs) emissions of 3D printing process.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Formation of Environmentally Persistent Free Radicals (EPFRs) on the Phenol-DosedThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Environmentally persistent free radicals in PMWaste disposal & sustainable energy · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Albert Leo N dela CruzDepartment of Chemistry, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802, United States.
William Gehling
Slawomir Lomnicki
Robert Cook
Barry Dellinger

Funding

Role of microbiota in increased influenza severity due to particulate matter exposureP42ES013648 · NIEHS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI SPRUNGER, PHILLIP · 2009 to 2024
$27.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS 1P42ES013648-01A2NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES013648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs) have previously been observed in association with combustion-generated particles and airborne PM(2.5) (particulate matter, d < 2.5um). The purpose of this study was to determine if similar radicals were present in soils and sediments at Superfund sites. The site was a former wood treating facility containing pentachlorophenol (PCP) as a major contaminant. Both contaminated and noncontaminated (just outside the contaminated area) soil samples were collected. The samples were subjected to the conventional humic substances (HS) extraction procedure. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy was used to measure the EPFR concentrations and determine their structure for each sample fraction. Analyses revealed a ∼30× higher EPFR concentration in the PCP contaminated soils (20.2 × 10(17) spins/g) than in the noncontaminated soil (0.7 × 10(17) spins/g). Almost 90% of the EPFR signal originated from the minerals/clays/humins fraction. GC-MS analyses revealed ∼6500 ppm of PCP in the contaminated soil samples and none detected in the background samples. Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrophotometry (ICP-AES) analyses revealed ∼7× higher concentrations of redox-active transition metals, in the contaminated soils than the noncontaminated soil. Vapor phase and liquid phase dosing of the clays/minerals/humins fraction of the soil with PCP resulted in an EPR signal identical to that observed in the contaminated soil, strongly suggesting the observed EPFR is pentachlorophenoxyl radical. Chemisorption and electron transfer from PCP to transition metals and other electron sinks in the soil are proposed to be responsible for EPFR formation.

Indexed as

Electron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyEnvironmental PollutionFree RadicalsMineralsModels, ChemicalPentachlorophenolSoil PollutantsTemperatureWoodFree RadicalsMineralsPentachlorophenolSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID21732664
PMCPMC3167238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.