Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21732195›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2011

A randomized trial to improve patient-centered care and hypertension control in underserved primary care patients.

Lisa A Cooper, Debra L Roter, Kathryn A Carson, Lee R Bone, Susan M Larson, Edgar R Miller, Michael S Barr, David M Levine

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 27 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 27 pooled it
25.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 27 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Guideline
  13. Guideline
  14. Guideline
  15. Interventions to support shared decision making for hypertension: A systematic review of controlled studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Pooled it
  16. Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa A CooperWelch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. lisa.cooper@jhmi.edu
Debra L Roter
Kathryn A Carson
Lee R Bone
Susan M Larson
Edgar R Miller
Michael S Barr
David M Levine
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USAmerican College of Physicians · US

Funding

Patient-Physician Partnership to Improve HBP AdherenceR01HL069403 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, LISA A · 2001 to 2004
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL069403NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL69403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican Americans and persons with low socioeconomic status (SES) are disproportionately affected by hypertension and receive less patient-centered care than less vulnerable patient populations. Moreover, continuing medical education (CME) and patient-activation interventions have infrequently been directed to improve the processes of care for these populations.

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of patient-centered interventions targeting patients and physicians with the effectiveness of minimal interventions for underserved groups.

designRandomized controlled trial conducted from January 2002 through August 2005, with patient follow-up at 3 and 12 months, in 14 urban, community-based practices in Baltimore, Maryland.

participantsForty-one primary care physicians and 279 hypertension patients.

interventionsPhysician communication skills training and patient coaching by community health workers. MAIN MEASURES: Physician communication behaviors; patient ratings of physicians' participatory decision-making (PDM), patient involvement in care (PIC), reported adherence to medications; systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and BP control. KEY

resultsVisits of trained versus control group physicians demonstrated more positive communication change scores from baseline (-0.52 vs. -0.82, p = 0.04). At 12 months, the patient+physician intensive group compared to the minimal intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in patient report of physicians' PDM (β = +6.20 vs. -5.24, p = 0.03) and PIC dimensions related to doctor facilitation (β = +0.22 vs. -0.17, p = 0.03) and information exchange (β = +0.32 vs. -0.22, p = 0.005). Improvements in patient adherence and BP control did not differ across groups for the overall patient sample. However, among patients with uncontrolled hypertension at baseline, non-significant reductions in systolic BP were observed among patients in all intervention groups-the patient+physician intensive (-13.2 mmHg), physician intensive/patient minimal (-10.6 mmHg), and the patient intensive/physician minimal (-16.8 mmHg), compared to the patient+physician minimal group (-2.0 mmHg).

conclusionInterventions that enhance physicians' communication skills and activate patients to participate in their care positively affect patient-centered communication, patient perceptions of engagement in care, and may improve systolic BP among urban African-American and low SES patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Indexed as

Medically Underserved AreaAdultAntihypertensive AgentsBlack or African AmericanCommunicationDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansHypertensionMalePatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID21732195
PMCPMC3208476
OpenAlexW2011144714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.