ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2012
[Outcome and predictors of early geriatric rehabilitation in an acute care setting].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Impact of psychiatric disorders on the outcome of acute geriatric inpatient treatment: an exploratory investigation].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2020Article
- [The De Morton Mobility Index for evaluation of early geriatric rehabilitation].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2016Article
- [Early geriatric rehabilitation: an opportunity for the oldest old].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeriatric assessment and treatment including an interdisciplinary team is a well accepted method to improve functionality and mortality in the elderly. Nevertheless, only little evidence and limited data are available concerning the outcome of this approach in an acute care setting and early rehabilitation. PATIENTS AND
methodsAll patients included in a comprehensive geriatric program within 1 year were eligible for inclusion in a retrospective chart analysis. Admission to the program was allowed after counseling by an experienced geriatrician applying pre-defined criteria including significant deconditioning, preserved rehabilitation prognosis and/or ongoing instable medical condition requiring an acute care setting. Patients who refused therapy or died within the first week of treatment were excluded. A telephone interview was performed 6 months after patient discharge and data concerning mortality, functional course and quality of life (activities of daily life ADL) were retrieved. All patients were treated in an acute care setting in two geriatric and general internal medicine wards.
resultsA total of 138 patients were included in the program. In 128 cases data concerning the 6 month mortality could be retrieved and 92 patients agreed to participate in a complete telephone interview. Mortality within the early rehabilitation course was 4%, the 6 month mortality however was 28%. Functionality improved during early rehabilitation and a median increment of 10 points in the Barthel index was found (range 0-100). Analysis of individual increments showed high interindividual variability throughout the whole range of the ADL score at the beginning of the treatment. Concerning the 6 month course after hospital discharge functionality remained at a steady median value but showed a large range of both increasing and decreasing ADL values. Analysis of predictors by logistic regression revealed the ADL score on admission to the early rehabilitation program as the predominant predictor overriding other factors such as depression or cognitive impairment. An ADL value ≤15 on admission was a strong predictor for an unfavorable outcome in early rehabilitation defined as death or an ADL increment ≤10. An ADL value ≤15 on admission was also a strong predictor for overall mortality within 6 months. On the other hand an ADL value ≤15 on admission was a strong predictor for a steady or increasing functionality among the survivors of the 6 month postdischarge interval.
conclusionsThe mortality rate in the early rehabilitation course in this preliminary and observational study was relatively low and may be explained by both the exclusion of patients not surviving the first week of treatment and an effective inclusion algorithm. The high overall 6 month mortality rate may also be explained by the selection of patients focusing on those severely functionally impaired. This subpopulation of elderly inpatients in acute care units reveals a high vulnerability to critical incidents. Besides scale effects there is also a remarkable variability in the 6 month postdischarge course pointing to heterogeneity and different patterns concerning the time course of functionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.