Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21731688›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

The Streptococcus pneumoniae pilus-1 displays a biphasic expression pattern.

Gabriella De Angelis, Monica Moschioni, Alessandro Muzzi, Alfredo Pezzicoli, Stefano Censini, Isabel Delany, Morena Lo Sapio, Antonia Sinisi, Claudio Donati, Vega Masignani and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bacteriological characteristics and changes ofEpidemiology and infection · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Phase Variation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2019
    Article
  8. Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel Molecular Insights about Lactobacillar Sortase-Dependent Piliation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Serotype-independent pneumococcal vaccines.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriella De AngelisNovartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Siena, Italy.
Monica Moschioni
Alessandro Muzzi
Alfredo Pezzicoli
Stefano Censini
Isabel Delany
Morena Lo Sapio
Antonia Sinisi
Claudio Donati
Vega Masignani
Michèle A Barocchi
Newron Pharmaceuticals (Italy) · ITNovartis (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Streptococcus pneumoniae pilus-1 is encoded by pilus islet 1 (PI-1), which has three clonal variants (clade I, II and III) and is present in about 30% of clinical pneumococcal isolates. In vitro and in vivo assays have demonstrated that pilus-1 is involved in attachment to epithelial cells and virulence, as well as protection in mouse models of infection. Several reports suggest that pilus-1 expression is tightly regulated and involves the interplay of numerous genetic regulators, including the PI-1 positive regulator RlrA. In this report we provide evidence that pilus expression, when analyzed at the single-cell level in PI-1 positive strains, is biphasic. In fact, the strains present two phenotypically different sub-populations of bacteria, one that expresses the pilus, while the other does not. The proportions of these two phenotypes are variable among the strains tested and are not influenced by genotype, serotype, growth conditions, colony morphology or by the presence of antibodies directed toward the pilus components. Two sub-populations, enriched in pilus expressing or not expressing bacteria were obtained by means of colony selection and immuno-detection methods for five strains. PI-1 sequencing in the two sub-populations revealed the absence of mutations, thus indicating that the biphasic expression observed is not due to a genetic modification within PI-1. Microarray expression profile and western blot analyses on whole bacterial lysates performed comparing the two enriched sub-populations, revealed that pilus expression is regulated at the transcriptional level (on/off regulation), and that there are no other genes, in addition to those encoded by PI-1, concurrently regulated across the strains tested. Finally, we provide evidence that the over-expression of the RrlA positive regulator is sufficient to induce pilus expression in pilus-1 negative bacteria. Overall, the data presented here suggest that the observed biphasic pilus expression phenotype could be an example of bistability in pneumococcus.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialAnimalsBacterial ProteinsColony Count, MicrobialFimbriae, BacterialGenes, BacterialGenotypeImmune SeraMicePhylogenyPolymerizationSerotypingStreptococcus pneumoniaeTranscription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsImmune Sera

Identifiers

PMID21731688
PMCPMC3120856
OpenAlexW2041452716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.