Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21731638›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Adaptive evolution of the venom-targeted vWF protein in opossums that eat pitvipers.

Sharon A Jansa, Robert S Voss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Convergent evolution of toxin resistance in animals.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Phylogenetically diverse diets favor more complex venoms in North American pitvipers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Resistance of South American opossums to vWF-binding venom C-type lectins.Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sharon A JansaDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, and J.F. Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America. jansa003@umn.edu
Robert S Voss
American Museum of Natural History · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid evolution of venom toxin genes is often explained as the result of a biochemical arms race between venomous animals and their prey. However, it is not clear that an arms race analogy is appropriate in this context because there is no published evidence for rapid evolution in genes that might confer toxin resistance among routinely envenomed species. Here we report such evidence from an unusual predator-prey relationship between opossums (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) and pitvipers (Serpentes: Crotalinae). In particular, we found high ratios of replacement to silent substitutions in the gene encoding von Willebrand Factor (vWF), a venom-targeted hemostatic blood protein, in a clade of opossums known to eat pitvipers and to be resistant to their hemorrhagic venom. Observed amino-acid substitutions in venom-resistant opossums include changes in net charge and hydrophobicity that are hypothesized to weaken the bond between vWF and one of its toxic snake-venom ligands, the C-type lectin-like protein botrocetin. Our results provide the first example of rapid adaptive evolution in any venom-targeted molecule, and they support the notion that an evolutionary arms race might be driving the rapid evolution of snake venoms. However, in the arms race implied by our results, venomous snakes are prey, and their venom has a correspondingly defensive function in addition to its usual trophic role.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularFeeding BehaviorAdaptation, PhysiologicalAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBayes TheoremBinding SitesCrotalid VenomsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataOpossumsPhylogenyProtein Structure, TertiaryQuantitative Trait, HeritableSelection, GeneticViperidaebotrocetinCrotalid VenomsViper Venomsvon Willebrand Factor

Identifiers

PMID21731638
PMCPMC3120824
OpenAlexW2170508585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.