Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21731626›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

New insights into the evolution of Wolbachia infections in filarial nematodes inferred from a large range of screened species.

Emanuele Ferri, Odile Bain, Michela Barbuto, Coralie Martin, Nathan Lo, Shigehiko Uni, Frederic Landmann, Sara G Baccei, Ricardo Guerrero, Sueli de Souza Lima and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New insights into the genetic diversity, phylogeny, and immunogenic potential of theCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  10. Detection ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparative analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Redescription, molecular characterisation andCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  16. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Royal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Emanuele FerriDipartimento di Biotecnologie e Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Odile Bain
Michela Barbuto
Coralie Martin
Nathan Lo
Shigehiko Uni
Frederic Landmann
Sara G Baccei
Ricardo Guerrero
Sueli de Souza Lima
Claudio Bandi
Samuel Wanji
Moustapha Diagne
Maurizio Casiraghi
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentral University of Venezuela · VECheikh Anta Diop University · SNOsaka City University · JPUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWolbachia are intriguing symbiotic endobacteria with a peculiar host range that includes arthropods and a single nematode family, the Onchocercidae encompassing agents of filariases. This raises the question of the origin of infection in filariae. Wolbachia infect the female germline and the hypodermis. Some evidences lead to the theory that Wolbachia act as mutualist and coevolved with filariae from one infection event: their removal sterilizes female filariae; all the specimens of a positive species are infected; Wolbachia are vertically inherited; a few species lost the symbiont. However, most data on Wolbachia and filaria relationships derive from studies on few species of Onchocercinae and Dirofilariinae, from mammals. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe investigated the Wolbachia distribution testing 35 filarial species, including 28 species and 7 genera and/or subgenera newly screened, using PCR, immunohistochemical staining, whole mount fluorescent analysis, and cocladogenesis analysis. (i) Among the newly screened Onchocercinae from mammals eight species harbour Wolbachia but for some of them, bacteria are absent in the hypodermis, or in variable density. (ii) Wolbachia are not detected in the pathological model Monanema martini and in 8, upon 9, species of Cercopithifilaria. (iii) Supergroup F Wolbachia is identified in two newly screened Mansonella species and in Cercopithifilaria japonica. (iv) Type F Wolbachia infect the intestinal cells and somatic female genital tract. (v) Among Oswaldofilariinae, Waltonellinae and Splendidofilariinae, from saurian, anuran and bird respectively, Wolbachia are not detected. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The absence of Wolbachia in 63% of onchocercids, notably in the ancestral Oswaldofilariinae estimated 140 mya old, the diverse tissues or specimens distribution, and a recent lateral transfer in supergroup F Wolbachia, modify the current view on the role and evolution of the endosymbiont and their hosts. Further genomic analyses on some of the newly sampled species are welcomed to decipher the open questions.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBase SequenceDNA, RibosomalFemaleFilarioideaFluorescenceGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHost SpecificityPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionPropidiumSpecies SpecificityWolbachiaDNA, RibosomalPropidium

Identifiers

PMID21731626
PMCPMC3120775
OpenAlexW2027515342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.