ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2011
Evaluation of nanoparticle uptake in tumors in real time using intravital imaging.
Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- The avian embryo as a time-honoured animal model in developmental, biomedical and agricultural research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- The CAM Model-Q&A with Experts.Cancers · 2022Review
- The Role of Optical Imaging in Translational Nanomedicine.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Blocking Studies to Evaluate Receptor-Specific Radioligand Binding in the CAM Model by PET and MR Imaging.Cancers · 2022Article
- Article
- The Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay in Nanotoxicological Research-An Alternative forNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Amplification of a calcium channel subunit CACNG4 increases breast cancer metastasis.EBioMedicine · 2020Article
- FunctionalizedCancers · 2019Article
- On the issue of transparency and reproducibility in nanomedicine.Nature nanotechnology · 2019Article
- Viral nanoparticles decorated with novel EGFL7 ligands enable intravital imaging of tumor neovasculature.Nanoscale · 2017Article
- Synthetic plant virology for nanobiotechnology and nanomedicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2017Review
- Non-interferometric photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy.Light, science & applications · 2017Article
- Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-Dependent and -Independent Paracrine Signaling by Sunitinib-Resistant Renal Cell Carcinoma.Molecular and cellular biology · 2016Article
- Directional cell movement through tissues is controlled by exosome secretion.Nature communications · 2015Article
- The chick embryo as an expanding experimental model for cancer and cardiovascular research.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2014Review
- Molecular targeted viral nanoparticles as tools for imaging cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014Article
- Differential uptake of chemically modified cowpea mosaic virus nanoparticles in macrophage subpopulations present in inflammatory and tumor microenvironments.Biomacromolecules · 2012Article
- Real-time visualization and quantitation of vascular permeability in vivo: implications for drug delivery.PloS one · 2012Article
- Nanobarcoding: detecting nanoparticles in biological samples using in situ polymerase chain reaction.International journal of nanomedicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Current technologies for tumor imaging, such as ultrasound, MRI, PET and CT, are unable to yield high-resolution images for the assessment of nanoparticle uptake in tumors at the microscopic level(1,2,3,) highlighting the utility of a suitable xenograft model in which to perform detailed uptake analyses. Here, we use high-resolution intravital imaging to evaluate nanoparticle uptake in human tumor xenografts in a modified, shell-less chicken embryo model. The chicken embryo model is particularly well-suited for these in vivo analyses because it supports the growth of human tumors, is relatively inexpensive and does not require anesthetization or surgery 4,5. Tumor cells form fully vascularized xenografts within 7 days when implanted into the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM)( 6). The resulting tumors are visualized by non-invasive real-time, high-resolution imaging that can be maintained for up to 72 hours with little impact on either the host or tumor systems. Nanoparticles with a wide range of sizes and formulations administered distal to the tumor can be visualized and quantified as they flow through the bloodstream, extravasate from leaky tumor vasculature, and accumulate at the tumor site. We describe here the analysis of nanoparticles derived from Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) decorated with near-infrared fluorescent dyes and/or polyethylene glycol polymers (PEG) (7, 8, 9,10,11). Upon intravenous administration, these viral nanoparticles are rapidly internalized by endothelial cells, resulting in global labeling of the vasculature both outside and within the tumor(7,12). PEGylation of the viral nanoparticles increases their plasma half-life, extends their time in the circulation, and ultimately enhances their accumulation in tumors via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect (7, 10,11). The rate and extent of accumulation of nanoparticles in a tumor is measured over time using image analysis software. This technique provides a method to both visualize and quantify nanoparticle dynamics in human tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.