Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21730939›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2011

Evaluation of nanoparticle uptake in tumors in real time using intravital imaging.

Choi-Fong Cho, Amber Ablack, Hon-Sing Leong, Andries Zijlstra, John Lewis

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The avian embryo as a time-honoured animal model in developmental, biomedical and agricultural research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. The Role of Optical Imaging in Translational Nanomedicine.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. FunctionalizedCancers · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Synthetic plant virology for nanobiotechnology and nanomedicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The chick embryo as an expanding experimental model for cancer and cardiovascular research.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2014
    Review
  16. Molecular targeted viral nanoparticles as tools for imaging cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Choi-Fong ChoDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario.
Amber Ablack
Hon-Sing Leong
Andries Zijlstra
John Lewis
Prostate Cancer Research · GBVanderbilt University · USWestern University · CA

Funding

Tetraspanin-mediated regulation of tumor cell migration and metastasisR01CA143081 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZIJLSTRA, ANDRIES · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
The molecular mechanisms of migration of which lead to tumor cell intravasation.K01CA120711 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZIJLSTRA, ANDRIES · 2007 to 2011
$719k
CIHR 84535NCI NIH HHS CA120711-01A1NCI NIH HHS K01 CA120711NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current technologies for tumor imaging, such as ultrasound, MRI, PET and CT, are unable to yield high-resolution images for the assessment of nanoparticle uptake in tumors at the microscopic level(1,2,3,) highlighting the utility of a suitable xenograft model in which to perform detailed uptake analyses. Here, we use high-resolution intravital imaging to evaluate nanoparticle uptake in human tumor xenografts in a modified, shell-less chicken embryo model. The chicken embryo model is particularly well-suited for these in vivo analyses because it supports the growth of human tumors, is relatively inexpensive and does not require anesthetization or surgery 4,5. Tumor cells form fully vascularized xenografts within 7 days when implanted into the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM)( 6). The resulting tumors are visualized by non-invasive real-time, high-resolution imaging that can be maintained for up to 72 hours with little impact on either the host or tumor systems. Nanoparticles with a wide range of sizes and formulations administered distal to the tumor can be visualized and quantified as they flow through the bloodstream, extravasate from leaky tumor vasculature, and accumulate at the tumor site. We describe here the analysis of nanoparticles derived from Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) decorated with near-infrared fluorescent dyes and/or polyethylene glycol polymers (PEG) (7, 8, 9,10,11). Upon intravenous administration, these viral nanoparticles are rapidly internalized by endothelial cells, resulting in global labeling of the vasculature both outside and within the tumor(7,12). PEGylation of the viral nanoparticles increases their plasma half-life, extends their time in the circulation, and ultimately enhances their accumulation in tumors via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect (7, 10,11). The rate and extent of accumulation of nanoparticles in a tumor is measured over time using image analysis software. This technique provides a method to both visualize and quantify nanoparticle dynamics in human tumors.

Indexed as

AnimalsChick EmbryoChorioallantoic MembraneColonic NeoplasmsComovirusFluorescent DyesHT29 CellsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroinjectionsMicroscopyNanoparticlesPolyethylene GlycolsFluorescent DyesPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID21730939
PMCPMC3197055
OpenAlexW2089799788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.