Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21730044›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2011

Calcium signaling in neuronal development.

Sheila S Rosenberg, Nicholas C Spitzer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Calcium and CaBrain sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Unraveling the impact ofBrain communications · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Activation of CaExperimental brain research · 2025
    Article
  16. Developmental regulation of GABAHistology and histopathology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sheila S RosenbergNeurobiology Section, Division of Biological Sciences, Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
Nicholas C Spitzer

Funding

THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEURONSR01NS015918 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SPITZER, NICHOLAS CANADAY · 1985 to 2017
$5.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS015918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of the nervous system involves the generation of a stunningly diverse array of neuronal subtypes that enable complex information processing and behavioral outputs. Deciphering how the nervous system acquires and interprets information and orchestrates behaviors will be greatly enhanced by the identification of distinct neuronal circuits and by an understanding of how these circuits are formed, changed, and/or maintained over time. Addressing these challenging questions depends in part on the ability to accurately identify and characterize the unique neuronal subtypes that comprise individual circuits. Distinguishing characteristics of neuronal subgroups include but are not limited to neurotransmitter phenotype, dendritic morphology, the identity of synaptic partners, and the expression of constellations of subgroup-specific proteins, including ion channel subtypes.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAxonsCalcium ChannelsCalcium SignalingCell DifferentiationDendritesNervous SystemNeuronsSynaptic TransmissionCalcium Channels

Identifiers

PMID21730044
PMCPMC3179332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.