Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21729764›Full record

ArticleMutation research2011

Defining EMS and ENU dose-response relationships using the Pig-a mutation assay in rats.

Krista L Dobo, Ronald D Fiedler, William C Gunther, Catherine J Thiffeault, Zoryana Cammerer, Stephanie L Coffing, Thomas Shutsky, Maik Schuler

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Mutation research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Setting Occupational Exposure Limits for Genotoxic Substances in the Pharmaceutical Industry.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Influence of DNA repair on nonlinear dose-responses for mutation.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krista L DoboPfizer Global Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology Center of Emphasis, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, United States. krista.l.dobo@pfizer.com
Ronald D Fiedler
William C Gunther
Catherine J Thiffeault
Zoryana Cammerer
Stephanie L Coffing
Thomas Shutsky
Maik Schuler
Pfizer (United States) · US

Funding

Versatile Mutation Assay Based on the Pig-A LocusR44ES015940 · NIEHS · LITRON LABORATORIES, LTD. · PI DERTINGER, STEPHEN D · 2008 to 2009
$768k
NIEHS NIH HHS R44 ES015940NIEHS NIH HHS R44ES015940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, experimental evidence has accumulated that supports the existence of sublinear dose-response relationships at low doses of DNA reactive mutagens. However, creating the in vivo data necessary to allow for a more detailed dose-response modeling with the currently available tools might not always be practical. The purpose of the current work was to evaluate the utility of the Pig-a gene mutation assay to rapidly identify dose-response relationships for direct acting genotoxicants. The induction of mutations in the peripheral blood of rats was evaluated following 28 days of exposure down to low doses of the direct acting alkylating agents ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) and ethylnitrosourea (ENU). Using statistical modeling based on the 28-day studies, a threshold for mutation induction for EMS was estimated to be 21.9mg/kg, whereas for the more potent ENU, the threshold was estimated to be 0.88mg/kg. Comparing mutation frequencies from acute and sub-chronic dosing indicated less than additive dose-response relationships, further confirming the possibility of a threshold dose-response relationship for both compounds. In conclusion, the work presented provides evidence that the Pig-a assay might be a practical alternative to other in vivo mutation assays when assessing dose-response relationships for direct acting mutagens and that an experimental approach using fractionated dosing could be used to substantiate a biological mechanism responsible for the observation of a sublinear dose-response relationship.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugAnimalsEthyl MethanesulfonateEthylnitrosoureaMembrane ProteinsMutagenicity TestsMutagensRatsEthyl MethanesulfonateEthylnitrosoureaMembrane ProteinsMutagensphosphatidylinositol glycan-class A protein

Identifiers

PMID21729764
PMCPMC3167948
OpenAlexW2058877157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.