Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21729667›Full record

Trial reportClinical breast cancer2011

Phase II trial of saracatinib (AZD0530), an oral SRC-inhibitor for the treatment of patients with hormone receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Ayca Gucalp, Joseph A Sparano, James Caravelli, Jean Santamauro, Sujata Patil, Alyson Abbruzzi, Christine Pellegrino, Jackie Bromberg, Chau Dang, Maria Theodoulou and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical breast cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. AhR and STAT3: A Dangerous Duo in Chemical Carcinogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dual Drug Repurposing: The Example of Saracatinib.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Logic-based mechanistic machine learning on high-content images reveals how drugs differentially regulate cardiac fibroblasts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ayca GucalpBreast Cancer Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Joseph A Sparano
James Caravelli
Jean Santamauro
Sujata Patil
Alyson Abbruzzi
Christine Pellegrino
Jackie Bromberg
Chau Dang
Maria Theodoulou
Joan Massague
Larry Norton
Clifford Hudis
Tiffany A Traina
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMontefiore Medical Center · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS N01-CA-62240NCI NIH HHS N01 CM062206NCI NIH HHS N01-CM-62206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSRC activation is associated with cell migration, proliferation, and metastasis. Saracatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) selective for SRC. We performed this trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saracatinib monotherapy in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)(-) and progesterone receptor (PR)(-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients who had undergone ≤ 1 previous chemotherapy regimen for measurable ER(-) and PR(-) MBC received saracatinib 175 mg orally daily. The primary endpoint was disease control defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD) > 6 months. Secondary endpoints included toxicity and progression-free survival (PFS). Levels of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in response to therapy were measured over time.

resultsNine patients were treated on study. After a median of 2 cycles (range 1-3), no patient had achieved CR, PR, or SD >6 months. The median time to treatment failure was 82 days (12-109 days).The majority (89%) of patients discontinued saracatinib because of disease progression. One patient acquired potentially treatment-related grade 4 hypoxia with interstitial infiltrates and was removed from the study. Common adverse events included fatigue, elevated liver enzymes, nausea, hyponatremia, dyspnea, cough, and adrenal insufficiency.

conclusionsThese efficacy results were not sufficiently promising to justify continued accrual to this study. Based on this series, saracatinib does not appear to have significant single-agent activity for the treatment of patients with ER(-)/PR(-) MBC.

Indexed as

Receptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBenzodioxolesBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNew York CityProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzodioxolesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesQuinazolinesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesteronesaracatinib

Identifiers

PMID21729667
PMCPMC3222913
OpenAlexW2000596607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.