Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21729269›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2011

Predation efficiency of Anopheles gambiae larvae by aquatic predators in western Kenya highlands.

Eliningaya J Kweka, Guofa Zhou, Thomas M Gilbreath, Yaw Afrane, Mramba Nyindo, Andrew K Githeko, Guiyun Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Malaria Risk Drivers in the Brazilian Amazon: Land Use-Land Cover Interactions and Biological Diversity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bio-Control ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eliningaya J KwekaCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, P O Box 1578, Kisumu 40100, Kenya. pat.kweka@gmail.com
Guofa Zhou
Thomas M Gilbreath
Yaw Afrane
Mramba Nyindo
Andrew K Githeko
Guiyun Yan

Funding

Ecology of African Highland MalariaR01AI050243 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI YAN, GUIYUN · 2001 to 2018
$8.8M
Research Training in Mosquito Genomics and Bioinformat*D43TW001505 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Guiyun Yan · 2000 to 2026
$6.0M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW001505FIC NIH HHS D43 TW01505NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI-50243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current status of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes and the effects of insecticides on non-target insect species have raised the need for alternative control methods for malaria vectors. Predation has been suggested as one of the important regulation mechanisms for malaria vectors in long-lasting aquatic habitats, but the predation efficiency of the potential predators is largely unknown in the highlands of western Kenya. In the current study, we examined the predation efficiency of five predators on Anopheles gambiae s.s larvae in 24 hour and semi- field evaluations.

methodsPredators were collected from natural habitats and starved for 12 hours prior to starting experiments. Preliminary experiments were conducted to ascertain the larval stage most predated by each predator species. When each larval instar was subjected to predation, third instar larvae were predated at the highest rate. Third instar larvae of An. gambiae were introduced into artificial habitats with and without refugia at various larval densities. The numbers of surviving larvae were counted after 24 hours in 24. In semi-field experiments, the larvae were counted daily until they were all either consumed or had developed to the pupal stage. Polymerase chain reaction was used to confirm the presence of An. gambiae DNA in predator guts.

resultsExperiments found that habitat type (P < 0.0001) and predator species (P < 0.0001) had a significant impact on the predation rate in the 24 hour evaluations. In semi-field experiments, predator species (P < 0.0001) and habitat type (P < 0.0001) were significant factors in both the daily survival and the overall developmental time of larvae. Pupation rates took significantly longer in habitats with refugia. An. gambiae DNA was found in at least three out of ten midguts for all predator species. Gambusia affins was the most efficient, being three times more efficient than tadpoles.

conclusionThese experiments provide insight into the efficiency of specific natural predators against mosquito larvae. These naturally occurring predators may be useful in biocontrol strategies for aquatic stage An. gambiae mosquitoes. Further investigations should be done in complex natural habitats for these predators.

Indexed as

Predatory BehaviorAnimalsAnophelesCyprinodontiformesKenyaLarvaSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID21729269
PMCPMC3141748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.