Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21728052›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2011

COX-2 expression predicts worse breast cancer prognosis and does not modify the association with aspirin.

Michelle D Holmes, Wendy Y Chen, Stuart J Schnitt, Laura Collins, Graham A Colditz, Susan E Hankinson, Rulla M Tamimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Targeting Lipid Peroxidation for Cancer Treatment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Limited Proteolysis of Cyclooxygenase-2 Enhances Cell Proliferation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle D HolmesChanning Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. michelle.holmes@channing.harvard.edu
Wendy Y Chen
Stuart J Schnitt
Laura Collins
Graham A Colditz
Susan E Hankinson
Rulla M Tamimi

Funding

Statistical MethodsP01CA087969 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TWOROGER, SHELLEY S · 2000 to 2019
$77.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA87969NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some previous studies have found worse prognosis among cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-expressing breast cancers. Aspirin and NSAIDs inhibit COX-2. Three studies, including ours, have reported a survival advantage among women with breast cancer who take either aspirin or NSAIDs. Through this study we hypothesized that in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), COX-2 expression would be associated with worse prognosis, and aspirin use would be associated with better survival particularly among women with COX-2 positive tumors. In this study we investigated 2,001 women presenting with invasive breast cancers stained for COX-2 by immunohistochemistry. Tumor prognostic factors were from medical records. Aspirin use was assessed at least 12 months after diagnosis and updated. Cause of death was identified from death certificates. Statistical analyses included logistic regression of prognostic factors with COX-2 status as the outcome, and proportional hazards regression with breast cancer death as the outcome. Tumor COX-2 expression was associated with higher diagnostic stage. Compared with stage I, the RR(95% CI) for stages II-IV were 1.16 (0.93-1.45), 1.68 (1.27-2.22), and 1.76 (0.93-3.32). COX-2 expression was associated with lobular compared with ductal histology (1.40 [1.02-1.92]), and estrogen receptor positive compared with negative (2.22 [1.66-2.95]). The RR(95% CI) of breast cancer death for current aspirin use was similar for women with COX-2-positive and COX-2-negative tumors; 0.64 (0.43-0.96) and 0.57 (0.44-0.74), respectively. In the NHS, COX-2 breast cancer expression was associated with higher stage at diagnosis. The survival benefit associated with aspirin use did not differ by COX-2 status. COX-2 breast cancer expression is associated with worse prognosis. If aspirin truly impacts breast cancer survival, then it is not solely via COX-2.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic AgentsAspirinBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularCyclooxygenase 2Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsAspirinBiomarkers, TumorCyclooxygenase 2ERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPTGS2 protein, humanReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID21728052
PMCPMC3292350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.