Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21727131›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2011

Using heterokaryons to understand pluripotency and reprogramming.

Francesco M Piccolo, Carlos F Pereira, Irene Cantone, Karen Brown, Tomomi Tsubouchi, Jorge Soza-Ried, Matthias Merkenschlager, Amanda G Fisher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Altered Tumor Plasticity after Different Cancer Cell Fusions with MSC.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetic programming and reprogramming during development.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The evolving biology of cell reprogramming.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco M PiccoloLymphocyte Development Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
Carlos F Pereira
Irene Cantone
Karen Brown
Tomomi Tsubouchi
Jorge Soza-Ried
Matthias Merkenschlager
Amanda G Fisher

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120027516Medical Research Council MC_U120081295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reprogramming differentiated cells towards pluripotency can be achieved by different experimental strategies including the forced expression of specific 'inducers' and nuclear transfer. While these offer unparalleled opportunities to generate stem cells and advance disease modelling, the relatively low levels of successful reprogramming achieved (1-2%) makes a direct analysis of the molecular events associated with productive reprogramming very challenging. The generation of transient heterokaryons between human differentiated cells (such as lymphocytes or fibroblasts) and mouse pluripotent stem cell lines results in a much higher frequency of successful conversion (15% SSEA4 expressing cells) and provides an alternative approach to study early events during reprogramming. Under these conditions, differentiated nuclei undergo a series of remodelling events before initiating human pluripotent gene expression and silencing differentiation-associated genes. When combined with genetic or RNAi-based approaches and high-throughput screens, heterokaryon studies can provide important new insights into the factors and mechanisms required to reprogramme unipotent cells towards pluripotency.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingCytological TechniquesHumansPluripotent Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID21727131
PMCPMC3130413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.