Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21726569›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2012

Mouse pharmacological models of cognitive disruption relevant to schizophrenia.

Jared W Young, Susan B Powell, Mark A Geyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Developmental Manipulation-Induced Changes in Cognitive Functioning.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Neurophysiological Characterization of Attentional Performance Dysfunction in Schizophrenia Patients in a Reverse-Translated Task.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jared W YoungDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0804, La Jolla, CA 92093-0804, USA. jaredyoung@ucsd.edu
Susan B Powell
Mark A Geyer
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

DEVELOPMENTAL MODELS OF GATING DEFICITS IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH052885 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GEYER, MARK A · 1995 to 2010
$2.7M
Sensitive and Treatable Periods of Brain-Redox Imbalance in SchizophreniaR01MH091407 · NIMH · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI BEHRENS, M MARGARITA, POWELL, SUSAN B · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
Visuospatial priming in rats: A novel animal model for Tourette SyndromeR21MH091571 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI YOUNG, JARED WILLIAM · 2010 to 2011
$423k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH052885NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091407NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH091407NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH091571NIMH NIH HHS R21-MH091571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a debilitating cognitive disorder. The link between cognitive debilitation and functional outcome in patients with schizophrenia has prompted research to develop procognitive therapies. It is hoped that by improving cognition in these patients, their functional outcome will also improve. Although no established treatments exist as yet, progress has been made toward understanding how to evaluate putative compounds in the clinic. Genetic mouse models and pharmacological rat models of cognitive disruption are being developed that may help to evaluate these putative compounds preclinically. Considering the increased number of genetic mouse models relevant to schizophrenia, there is a need to evaluate pharmacological manipulations on cognition in mice. Here we review the current literature on mouse pharmacological models relevant to schizophrenia. In this review, we discuss where different pharmacological effects between rats and mice on cognitive tasks are observed and assess the validity offered by these models. We conclude that the predictive validity of these models is currently difficult to assess and that much more needs to be done to develop useful mouse pharmacological models of cognitive disruption in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalSchizophrenic PsychologyAnimalsCognition DisordersDopamine AgentsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsHumansMiceSchizophreniaDopamine AgentsExcitatory Amino Acid Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID21726569
PMCPMC3217063
OpenAlexW2083718947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.