ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011
Detection of lineage-specific evolutionary changes among primate species.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novelty versus innovation of gene regulatory elements in human evolution and disease.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025Review
- Single-cell phylogenies reveal changes in the evolutionary rate within cancer and healthy tissues.Cell genomics · 2023Article
- Assessing the impacts of various factors on circular RNA reliability.Life science alliance · 2023Article
- Frequency of Usher gene mutations in non-syndromic hearing loss: higher variability of the Usher phenotype.Journal of human genetics · 2020Article
- A-to-I RNA editing contributes to the persistence of predicted damaging mutations in populations.Genome research · 2019Article
- Assessment of imprinting- and genetic variation-dependent monoallelic expression using reciprocal allele descendants between human family trios.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Purifying selection shapes the coincident SNP distribution of primate coding sequences.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Comprehensive identification and analysis of human accelerated regulatory DNA.Genome research · 2015Article
- Problems with the nested granularity of feature domains in bioinformatics: the eXtasy case.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Article
- DNA methylation is associated with an increased level of conservation at nondegenerate nucleotides in mammals.Molecular biology and evolution · 2014Article
- eXtasy: variant prioritization by genomic data fusion.Nature methods · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComparison of the human genome with other primates offers the opportunity to detect evolutionary events that created the diverse phenotypes among the primate species. Because the primate genomes are highly similar to one another, methods developed for analysis of more divergent species do not always detect signs of evolutionary selection.
resultsWe have developed a new method, called DivE, specifically designed to find regions that have evolved either more or less rapidly than expected, for any clade within a set of very closely related species. Unlike some previous methods, DivE does not rely on rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution, which enables it to detect evolutionary events in noncoding regions. We demonstrate using simulated data that DivE compares favorably to alternative methods, and we then apply DivE to the ENCODE regions in 14 primate species. We identify thousands of regions in these primates, ranging from 50 to >10000 bp in length, that appear to have experienced either constrained or accelerated rates of evolution. In particular, we detected 4942 regions that have potentially undergone positive selection in one or more primate species. Most of these regions occur outside of protein-coding genes, although we identified 20 proteins that have experienced positive selection.
conclusionsDivE provides an easy-to-use method to predict both positive and negative selection in noncoding DNA, that is particularly well-suited to detecting lineage-specific selection in large genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.