Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21726221›Full record

ReviewInternational dental journal2011

Dental caries pathogenicity: a genomic and metagenomic perspective.

Scott N Peterson, Erik Snesrud, Nicholas J Schork, Walter A Bretz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International dental journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. pH-OBiofilm · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Embracing Personalized Medicine in Dentistry.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Acidogenicity and acid tolerance ofJournal of oral microbiology · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scott N PetersonThe J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD 20886, USA. scottp@jcvi.org
Erik Snesrud
Nicholas J Schork
Walter A Bretz
J. Craig Venter Institute · USNew York University · USScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Dental Caries Traits: The Genetic ContributionR01DE015351 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BRETZ, WALTER A. · 2004 to 2007
$1.2M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review we address the subject of dental caries pathogenicity from a genomic and metagenomic perspective. The application of genomic technologies is certain to yield novel insights into the relationship between the bacterial flora, dental health and disease. Three primary attributes of bacterial species are thought to have direct impact on caries development, these include: adherence on tooth surfaces (biofilm formation), acid production and acid tolerance. Attempts to define the specific aetiological agents of dental caries have proven to be elusive, supporting the notion that caries aetiology is perhaps complex and multi-faceted. The recently introduced Human Microbiome Project (HMP) that endeavors to characterise the micro-organisms living in and on the human body is likely to shed new light on these questions and improve our understanding of polymicrobial disease, microbial ecology in the oral cavity and provide new avenues for therapeutic and molecular diagnostics developments.

Indexed as

BiofilmsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenomicsAnimalsDental CariesDental PlaqueGene Expression ProfilingGlycolysisHumansMetagenomeMicrobial InteractionsStreptococcus mutans

Identifiers

PMID21726221
PMCPMC3699854
OpenAlexW1869787187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.