ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2011
[Therapy-refractory overactive bladder: alternative treatment approaches].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Urology goes electric-electrotherapy : Modern therapies in the treatment of modern diseases-examples from urology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of patients with overactive bladder (OAB) refractory to conventional treatment is gaining clinical significance. This article intends to review alternative therapy options for patients with OAB refractory to conventional treatment. A search of the PubMed database as well as the abstracts presented at the European Association of Urology and the American Urological Association annual meetings was conducted. Keywords used during this search included overactive bladder (OAB) refractory to conventional treatment, electromotive drug administration (EMDA), sacral neuromodulation, augmentation cystoplasty and cystectomy. Eighteen articles with an adequate number of patients were identified. All articles published before 2001 were not included in this analysis. Because of first-line treatment failure, 30% of the patients required alternative treatment. This included EMDA, botulinum toxin injections into the detrusor, sacral neuromodulation, augmentation cystoplasty or cystectomy. Based on this review it appears that a significant improvement in micturition parameters, continence and in quality of life was achieved. Overall EMDA, intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin and sacral neuromodulation seem to be highly effective and safe. Augmentation cystoplasty or cystectomy remains the last choice of treatment in refractory cases.Overall EMDA, intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin and sacral neuromodulation seem to be highly effective and safe. Augmentation cystoplasty or cystectomy remains to be the last choice of treatment in refractory cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.