ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2012
Bias flow does not affect ventilation during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in a pediatric animal model of acute lung injury.
Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bias flow rate and ventilation efficiency during adult high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: a lung model study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDuring high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, bias flow is the continuous flow of gas responsible for replenishing oxygen and removing CO(2) from the patient circuit. Bias flow is usually set at 20 L/min, but many patients require neuromuscular blockade at this flow rate. The need for neuromuscular blockade may be eliminated by increasing the bias flow rate, but CO(2) retention is a potential concern. We hypothesize that in a swine model of acute lung injury, increased bias flow rates will not affect CO(2) elimination.
designProspective, randomized, experimental study.
settingResearch laboratory at a university medical center. SUBJECTS: Sixteen juvenile swine.
interventionsSixteen juvenile swine (12-16.5 kg) were studied using a saline lavage model of acute lung injury. During high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, each animal was ventilated with bias flows of 10, 20, 30, and 40 L/min in random sequence. For ten animals, power was set at a constant level to maintain PaCO(2) 50-60 mm Hg, and amplitude was allowed to vary. For the remaining six animals, amplitude was kept constant to maintain PaCO(2) within the same range, while power was adjusted as needed with changes in bias flow. Linear regression was used for data analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsMedian overall PaCO(2) was 53 mm Hg (range: 31-81 mm Hg). Controlling for both power and amplitude, there was no statistically significant change in PaCO(2) as bias flow varied from 10 to 40 L/min.
conclusionsChanges in bias flow during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation did not affect ventilation. Further clinical investigation is ongoing in infants and children with acute lung injury being managed with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation to assess the impact of alterations of bias flow on gas exchange, cardiopulmonary parameters, sedation requirements, and other clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.